Cited by 1,404Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Acetylcholine as a Neuromodulator: Cholinergic Signaling Shapes Nervous System Function and Behavior

Open access
Picciotto, Marina R., Higley, Michael J., Mineur, Yann S.·2012·Neuron

Abstract

Acetylcholine in the brain alters neuronal excitability, influences synaptic transmission, induces synaptic plasticity and coordinates the firing of groups of neurons. As a result, it changes the state of neuronal networks throughout the brain and modifies their response to internal and external inputs: the classical role of a neuromodulator. Here we identify actions of cholinergic signaling on cellular and synaptic properties of neurons in several brain areas and discuss the consequences of this signaling on behaviors related to drug abuse, attention, food intake, and affect. The diverse effects of acetylcholine depend on the site of release, the receptor subtypes, and the target neuronal population, however, a common theme is that acetylcholine potentiates behaviors that are adaptive to environmental stimuli and decreases responses to ongoing stimuli that do not require immediate action. The ability of acetylcholine to coordinate the response of neuronal networks in many brain areas makes cholinergic modulation an essential mechanism underlying complex behaviors.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that acetylcholine (ACh) in the brain acts primarily as a neuromodulator rather than a point-to-point neurotransmitter, altering neuronal excitability, synaptic transmission, plasticity, and network firing to shape adaptive behavior. It synthesizes cholinergic actions across reward/addiction, attention, food intake, and stress/affect circuits, emphasizing that effects depend on release site, receptor subtype, and target population.

Key findings

  • ACh in the CNS predominantly changes neuronal excitability, presynaptic neurotransmitter release, synaptic plasticity, and coordinated firing of neuronal groups; a common theme is that ACh potentiates behaviors adaptive to environmental stimuli and decreases responses to ongoing stimuli that do not require immediate action.
  • Cholinergic signaling is highly heterogeneous: mAChRs (M1/M3/M5 coupled to Gq/PLC; M2/M4 coupled to Gi/o) and nAChRs (α2–α7 and β2–β4 subunits) act pre- and postsynaptically, and ACh may act via volume transmission as well as classical synapses.
  • In the mesolimbic dopamine system, PPTg/LDTg cholinergic input and VTA nAChRs/mAChRs modulate dopamine neuron firing and drug reward; striatal cholinergic interneurons pause after reward-associated cues, decreasing tonic dopamine release while maintaining phasic release, and MHb α5-containing nAChRs appear to act as a brake on nicotine intake.
  • ACh also modulates cortical attention/cue detection, hypothalamic food intake via POMC neurons, and stress-related systems; increased ACh signaling is linked to depressive symptoms, while mAChR or nAChR blockade/partial agonism can decrease depression-like behavior in rodents and, in clinical trials cited, depressive symptoms in humans.

Methods

  • Narrative review synthesizing anatomical, electrophysiological, pharmacological, genetic, optogenetic, behavioral, and human imaging/postmortem literature across multiple brain systems.
  • No primary experimental data, systematic search strategy, or meta-analysis is described.
  • Main analysis is conceptual integration of cited findings to support the thesis that central cholinergic neurotransmission is primarily neuromodulatory.

Limitations

  • The authors state critical gaps remain in understanding the dynamics of ACh release from different neuronal populations, how release changes with metabolic need or stress, how far ACh diffuses in different brain areas, and the physiological patterns of cholinergic firing; better tools are needed to mimic in vivo ACh release.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not systematically assess study quality or quantify effects, and its conclusions draw on heterogeneous species, preparations, and experimental approaches.
  • Evident from the text: several translational and causal links, especially between preclinical cholinergic mechanisms and human mood/affect, remain to be established.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.036

Cites

228 of 228 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 198 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisenone given

    Acetylcholine in the brain alters neuronal excitability.

    “Acetylcholine in the brain alters neuronal excitability, influences synaptic transmission, induces synaptic plasticity and coordinates the firing of groups of neurons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning

    The ability of acetylcholine to coordinate the response of neuronal networks in many brain areas makes cholinergic modulation an essential mechanism underlying complex behaviors.

    “The ability of acetylcholine to coordinate the response of neuronal networks in many brain areas makes cholinergic modulation an essential mechanism underlying complex behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisenone given

    The diverse effects of acetylcholine depend on the site of release, the receptor subtypes, and the target neuronal population.

    “The diverse effects of acetylcholine depend on the site of release, the receptor subtypes, and the target neuronal population, however, a common theme is that acetylcholine potentiates behaviors that are adaptive to environmental stimuli and decreases responses to ongoing stimuli that do not require immediate action.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisenone given

    Acetylcholine in the brain induces synaptic plasticity.

    “Acetylcholine in the brain alters neuronal excitability, influences synaptic transmission, induces synaptic plasticity and coordinates the firing of groups of neurons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisenone given

    Acetylcholine in the brain coordinates the firing of groups of neurons.

    “Acetylcholine in the brain alters neuronal excitability, influences synaptic transmission, induces synaptic plasticity and coordinates the firing of groups of neurons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 36
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Acetylcholine appears to act as a neuromodulator in the brain, despite its role as the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the periphery.

    “As a result, ACh appears to act as a neuromodulator in the brain, despite its role as the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the periphery.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Central cholinergic neurotransmission predominantly changes neuronal excitability, alters presynaptic release of neurotransmitters, and coordinates the firing of groups of neurons.

    “Instead, central cholinergic neurotransmission predominantly changes neuronal excitability, alters presynaptic release of neurotransmitters, and coordinates the firing of groups of neurons (Kawai et al., 2007; Rice and Cragg, 2004; Wonnacott, 1997; Zhang and Sulzer, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kawai et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rice and Cragg, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wonnacott, 1997 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Acetylcholine contributes to synaptic plasticity in many brain areas.

    “Further, ACh contributes to synaptic plasticity in many brain areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The role of acetylcholine as a neuromodulator in the brain is to increase neurotransmitter release in response to other inputs, to promote burst firing and/or suppress tonic firing, depending upon the system and the neuronal subtypes stimulated.

    “We propose that the role of ACh as a neuromodulator in the brain is to increase neurotransmitter release in response to other inputs, to promote burst firing and/or suppress tonic firing, depending upon the system and the neuronal subtypes stimulated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Acetylcholine potentiates behaviors that are adaptive to environmental stimuli and decreases responses to ongoing stimuli that do not require immediate action.

    “a common theme is that acetylcholine potentiates behaviors that are adaptive to environmental stimuli and decreases responses to ongoing stimuli that do not require immediate action.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Acetylcholine changes the state of neuronal networks throughout the brain and modifies their response to internal and external inputs.

    “As a result, it changes the state of neuronal networks throughout the brain and modifies their response to internal and external inputs: the classical role of a neuromodulator.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are located both pre- and post-synaptically throughout the brain, producing diverse consequences for brain activity.

    “Moreover, mAChRs are located both pre- and post-synaptically throughout the brain, producing diverse consequences for brain activity (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Presynaptic M2/M4 muscarinic receptors can act as inhibitory autoreceptors on cholinergic terminals and reduce glutamate release from corticocortical and corticostriatal synapses.

    “presynaptic M2/M4 mAChRs can act as inhibitory autoreceptors on cholinergic terminals (Douglas et al., 2002; Raiteri et al., 1984) and reduce glutamate release from corticocortical and corticostriatal synapses (Higley et al 2009, Gil et al 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Douglas et al., 2002 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Raiteri et al., 1984 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Higley et al 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    M1/M5 receptors can stimulate dopamine release from striatal synaptosomes and postsynaptic M1/M5 receptors can increase excitability of cortical pyramidal neurons.

    “In contrast, M1/M5 receptors can stimulate dopamine (DA) release from striatal synaptosomes (Zhang et al., 2002) and postsynaptic M1/M5 receptors can increase excitability of cortical pyramidal neurons (Douglas et al., 2002; McCormick and Prince, 1985).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Zhang et al., 2002 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Douglas et al., 2002 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites McCormick and Prince, 1985

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The two primary sources of acetylcholine in the brain include projection neurons that innervate distal areas and local interneurons that are interspersed among their cellular targets.

    “The two primary sources of ACh in the brain include projection neurons that innervate distal areas and local interneurons that are interspersed among their cellular targets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Nicotinic modulation of neurotransmitter release is often subtype-specific and this specificity can vary across brain areas.

    “Nicotinic modulation of neurotransmitter release is often subtype-specific and this specificity can vary across brain areas, with distinct nAChRs coupling to release of glutamate (α7) vs. GABA (α4β2*) (Mansvelder et al., 2002) or DA (α4/α6β2*) vs. ACh (α3β4*) (Grady et al., 2001) in the VTA, while β2* nAChRs can modulate the release of glutamate from thalamo-cortical projections (Parikh et al., 20”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Mansvelder et al., 2002 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Grady et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Parikh et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Signaling through nicotinic acetylcholine receptors is important for establishing critical periods for activity-dependent shaping of visual cortical function and maturation of thalamocortical and corticothalamic glutamatergic synapses.

    “In addition, signaling through nAChRs is also important for establishing critical periods for activity-dependent shaping of visual cortical function (Morishita et al., 2010) and maturation of thalamocortical (Aramakis and Metherate, 1998; Aramakis et al., 2000; Hsieh et al., 2002) and corticothalamic (Heath et al., 2010; Horst et al., 2012; King et al., 2003; Picciotto et al., 1995) glutamatergic”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Morishita et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Aramakis and Metherate, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Heath et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Acetylcholine released in the VTA is likely to potentiate glutamatergic synaptic transmission onto dopamine neurons through α7 nicotinic receptors, and may therefore increase the likelihood of burst firing of these neurons.

    “ACh released in the VTA is likely to potentiate glutamatergic synaptic transmission onto DA neurons through α7 nAChRs, and may therefore increase the likelihood of burst firing of these neurons (Grenhoff et al., 1986; Maskos, 2008; McGehee et al., 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Grenhoff et al., 1986 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Maskos, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites McGehee et al., 1995 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The pause in cholinergic interneuron firing results in decreased tonic dopamine release but maintained phasic dopamine release.

    “The pause results in decreased tonic DA release but maintained phasic DA release (Exley and Cragg, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Exley and Cragg, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Salient sensory stimuli in the environment, such as those associated with rewards or drugs of abuse, would increase activity of PPTg cholinergic neurons, leading to increased phasic firing of dopamine neurons in the VTA, while at the same time, decreasing the firing of tonically active cholinergic neurons in the NAc and striatum leading to a larger differential in dopamine release in response to

    “These findings suggest that salient sensory stimuli in the environment, such as those associated with rewards or drugs of abuse, would increase activity of PPTg cholinergic neurons, leading to increased phasic firing of DA neurons in the VTA (Maskos, 2008), while at the same time, decreasing the firing of tonically active cholinergic neurons in the NAc and striatum leading to a larger differential”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Maskos, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Exley and Cragg, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Antagonism of the α6/β2 class of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed on dopamine terminals in NAc decreases the breakpoint for progressive ratio responding in rats self-administering nicotine, suggesting that there is also a role for acetylcholine signaling through this class of receptors for mediating the motivational value of nicotine.

    “Since neuromodulation can be complex, it has also been shown that antagonism of the α6/β2 class of nAChRs expressed on DA terminals in NAc decreases the breakpoint for progressive ratio responding in rats self-administering nicotine, suggesting that there is also a role for ACh signaling through this class of receptors for mediating the motivational value of nicotine (Brunzell et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brunzell et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The MHb-interpeduncular pathway is cholinergic, and its effects on VTA neuron firing are mediated indirectly through inhibition of the PPTg.

    “The MHb-interpeduncular pathway is cholinergic, and it has been proposed that its effects on VTA neuron firing are mediated indirectly through inhibition of the PPTg (Maskos, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Maskos, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Decreasing the expression of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors containing the α5 subunit in the MHb results in increased nicotine self-administration, suggesting that this cholinergic system normally acts as a brake on drug reward.

    “Decreasing the expression of nAChRs containing the α5 subunit in the MHb results in increased nicotine self-administration (Fowler et al., 2011), suggesting that this cholinergic system normally acts as a brake on drug reward.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fowler et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The primary cholinergic input to the cerebral cortex comes from the BF complex, and particularly from substantia innominata of the nucleus basalis of Meynert.

    “The primary cholinergic input to the cerebral cortex comes from the BF complex, and particularly from substantia innominata of the the nucleus basalis of Meynert (Mesulam, 1995) though the latter remains debated (Zaborszky et al., 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mesulam, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The slow depolarization is mediated by M1 muscarinic receptor-mediated closure of M-type (KCNQ) potassium channels in pyramidal neurons enhancing their excitability and reducing their spike frequency adaptation.

    “The slow depolarization is mediated by M1 mAChR-mediated closure of M-type (KCNQ) potassium channels in pyramidal neurons (Delmas and Brown, 2005) enhancing their excitability and reducing their spike frequency adaptation (Gulledge et al., 2007; Hasselmo and Giocomo, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Delmas and Brown, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gulledge et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hasselmo and Giocomo, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Activation of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors hyperpolarizes pyramidal neurons via a mechanism dependent on fully-loaded internal calcium stores that occurs more quickly than the closure of M-type potassium channels.

    “Furthermore, activation of M1 mAChRs hyperpolarizes pyramidal neurons via a mechanism dependent on fully-loaded internal calcium stores that occurs more quickly than the closure of M-type potassium channels (Gulledge et al., 2007; Gulledge and Stuart, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gulledge et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gulledge and Stuart, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The simultaneous enhancement of feed-forward inputs from the thalamus through cholinergic actions on parvalbumin-positive interneurons, and suppression of intra-cortical feed-back inputs through effects on dendrite-targeting interneurons, may increase the signal-to-noise ratio in cortical networks, making neurons more sensitive to external stimuli.

    “The simultaneous enhancement of feed-forward inputs from the thalamus through cholinergic actions on parvalbumin-positive interneurons, and suppression of intra-cortical feed-back inputs through effects on dendrite-targeting interneurons, may increase the “signal-to-noise” ratio in cortical networks, making neurons more sensitive to external stimuli.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Activation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors on terminals of parvalbumin-expressing interneurons decreases the probability of GABA release onto the perisynaptic compartment of pyramidal neurons, and therefore reduces post-synaptic inhibition of pyramidal neurons.

    “whereas activation of mAChRs on terminals of parvalbumin-expressing interneurons decreases the probability of GABA release onto the perisynaptic compartment of pyramidal neurons, and therefore reduces post-synaptic inhibition of pyramidal neurons (Kruglikov and Rudy, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kruglikov and Rudy, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation strongly suppresses the spread of intra-cortical activity, leaving responses to thalamic inputs relatively intact.

    “In keeping with this view, mAChR activation strongly suppresses the spread of intra-cortical activity, leaving responses to thalamic inputs relatively intact (Kimura et al., 1999).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kimura et al., 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In rodents, the protein Lynx1 suppresses nicotinic signaling in primary visual cortex, and its removal promotes ocular dominance plasticity in older animals.

    “in rodents, the protein Lynx1 suppresses nicotinic signaling in primary visual cortex, and its removal promotes ocular dominance plasticity in older animals (Morishita et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Morishita et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cholinergic signaling can alter thermoregulation, sleep patterns, food intake and endocrine functions such as pancreatic release of insulin and glucagon.

    “Cholinergic signaling can alter thermoregulation (Myers and Waller, 1973), sleep patterns (Steriade, 2004), food intake (Grunberg et al., 1988; Mineur et al., 2011) and endocrine functions such as pancreatic release of insulin and glucagon (Ishikawa et al., 1982).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Myers and Waller, 1973

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Steriade, 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Grunberg et al., 1988 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There are intrinsic neurons within the hypothalamus that express the POMC peptide.

    “as well as the pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) peptide (Meister et al., 2006)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Meister et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cholinergic modulation of feeding behavior is multifactorial and state-dependent.

    “As might be expected from the complex regulation of hypothalamic neuronal activity by ACh, cholinergic modulation of feeding behavior is multifactorial and state-dependent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The hippocampus, amygdala and PFC receive a very high level of cholinergic input from the BF complex, in particular from the medial septum and nucleus basalis, respectively.

    “The hippocampus, amygdala and PFC receive a very high level of cholinergic input that come from the BF complex, and in particular, from the medial septum and nucleus basalis, respectively (Mesulam, 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mesulam, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hippocampal and cortical ACh levels can increase following restraint stress in rats, while ACh levels in the amygdala are unchanged.

    “For instance, hippocampal and cortical ACh levels can increase following restraint stress in rats, while ACh levels in the amygdala are unchanged”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mark et al., 1996 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    ACh release in the amygdala strengthens associations between environmental stimuli and stressful events, potentially contributing to maladaptive learning underlying affective disorders.

    “Thus, ACh release in the amygdala is thought to strengthen associations between environmental stimuli and stressful events, potentially contributing to maladaptive learning underlying affective disorders (Mansvelder et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mansvelder et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Human imaging and post mortem studies suggested that there is increased occupancy of nAChRs by ACh that is highest in individuals who are actively depressed and intermediate in those who have a history of depression with no change in overall nAChR number.

    “More recently, human imaging and post mortem studies suggested that there is increased occupancy of nAChRs by ACh that is highest in individuals who are actively depressed and intermediate in those who have a history of depression with no change in overall nAChR number (Saricicek et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Saricicek et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Decreasing striatal cholinergic tone in the mouse can lead to depression-like symptoms, likely through interneuron-dependent disinhibition of striatal neurons.

    “a recent study has shown that decreasing striatal cholinergic tone in the mouse can lead to depression-like symptoms, likely through interneuron-dependent disinhibition of striatal neurons (Warner-Schmidt et al., 2012)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Warner-Schmidt et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In rodent studies, the Flinders rat model was selected for its sensitivity to challenge with an AChE inhibitor, and sensitive rats also display a constellation of depression-like endophenotypes.

    “In rodent studies, the Flinders rat model was selected for its sensitivity to challenge with an AChE inhibitor, and sensitive rats also display a constellation of depression-like endophenotypes, supporting the idea that increasing ACh levels increases symptoms of depression (Overstreet, 1993).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Overstreet, 1993 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The behavioral effect of ACh signaling in vivo likely depends on the baseline conditions in the particular circuit of interest at the time of ACh release, and is the result of integration of its sometimes conflicting effects in different circuits.

    “The behavioral effect of ACh signaling in vivo likely depends on the baseline conditions in the particular circuit of interest at the time of ACh release, and is the result of integration of its, sometimes conflicting, effects in different circuits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The well-defined temporal association between firing of cholinergic projection neurons in the brain stem and the pause in firing of tonically active cholinergic interneurons in the striatum can facilitate the association of salient rewarding events with cues in the environment, contributing to reward prediction and promoting orienting behaviors toward potentially rewarding stimuli.

    “The well-defined temporal association between firing of cholinergic projection neurons in the brain stem and the pause in firing of tonically active cholinergic interneurons in the striatum can facilitate the association of salient rewarding events with cues in the environment, contributing to reward prediction and promoting orienting behaviors toward potentially rewarding stimuli.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This facilitation likely occurs through coordinated increases in glutamatergic drive that facilitate DA neuron burst firing, and decreases in response to subthreshold, tonic signals from DA terminals.

    “This likely occurs through coordinated increases in glutamatergic drive that facilitate DA neuron burst firing, and decreases in response to subthreshold, tonic signals from DA terminals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Salient signals that require focused attention for correct performance of behavioral tasks increase feed-forward activation of principal cortical neurons and decrease inhibition through specific classes of interneurons.

    “Similarly, salient signals that require focused attention for correct performance of behavioral tasks, increase feed-forward activation of principal cortical neurons and decrease inhibition through specific classes of interneurons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
38 of 38
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The hypothalamus is essential for homeostatic responses regulating metabolism.

    “The hypothalamus is essential for homeostatic responses regulating metabolism”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The role of ACh in control of autonomic functions is well known.

    “The role of ACh in control of autonomic functions is well known”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting receptor subtype for cortical depolarization

    Minor

    The paper first attributes the slow ACh-induced depolarization of cortical pyramidal neurons to M1 receptors, but later attributes the depolarization expected when calcium stores are depleted to M4 receptors. The latter statement conflicts with the receptor assignment used to explain that effect.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Parikh, 2007, Prefrontal acetylcholine release controls cue detection on multiple timescales, Neuron, 56, 141, 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.025 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Wess, 2003, Novel insights into muscarinic acetylcholine receptor function using gene targeting technology, Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 24, 414, 10.1016/S0165-6147(03)00195-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Picciotto, M. R., Higley, M. J., & Mineur, Y. S.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Picciotto, Marina R.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
116-129
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035946761
Cited by
1,404
References
228
Citations by year
2026: 133 · 2025: 186 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 159 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 137 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (MH077681, DA014241)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
acetylcholine, cholinergic neurotransmission, neuromodulation, synaptic plasticity, neuronal excitability, synaptic transmission, neuronal networks, cholinergic receptors, drug abuse, attention, dietary intake, affect, behavior
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Animals, Humans, Neurons, Signal Transduction, Neurotransmitter Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review