The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence for spinalN-methyl-d-aspartate receptor involvement in prolonged chemical nociception in the rat
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coderre, T. J., Katz, J., Vaccarino, A. L., & Melzack, R. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90161-h · Cited by 1,966
The induction of pain: an integrative review
Millan, M. J. (1999) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00048-3 · Cited by 1,774
Nitric oxide (NO) and nociceptive processing in the spinal cord
Meller, S. T., & Gebhart, G. F. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90124-8 · Cited by 952
Activity-dependent neuronal plasticity following tissue injury and inflammation
Dubner, R., & Ruda, M. A. (1992) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90019-5 · Cited by 926
Subcutaneous administration of botulinum toxin A reduces formalin-induced pain
Cui, M., Khanijou, S., Rubino, J., & Aoki, K. R. (2004) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.008 · Cited by 676
Metadata
- Authors
- Haley, J. E., Sullivan, A. F., & Dickenson, A. H.
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 518
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 218-226
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4232614478
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for spinalN-methyl-d-aspartate receptor involvement in prolonged chemical nociception in the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0006-8993(90)90975-h
- The paper
- Haley, J. E., Sullivan, A. F., & Dickenson, A. H. (1990). Evidence for spinalN-methyl-d-aspartate receptor involvement in prolonged chemical nociception in the rat. Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(90)90975-h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
