The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nitric oxide (NO) and nociceptive processing in the spinal cord
Abstract
There is considerable evidence to implicate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation in the mechanisms that underly thermal hyperalgesia in the spinal cord. As many of the effects of NMDA receptor activation appear to be ultimately mediated through production of nitric oxide (NO), recent reports have begun to define the role of NO in spinal nociceptive processing. From this evidence, it is likely that NO, produced in neurons in the spinal cord that contain NO synthase, like NMDA, plays a pivotal role in multisynaptic local circuit nociceptive processing in the spinal cord. Collectively, these reports suggest that the reflex withdrawal response to noxious heat is not mediated through activation of NMDA receptors and subsequent production of NO and cGMP, but that the acute NMDA-produced facilitation of thermal reflexes is NMDA-, NO- and cGMP-mediated and that a sustained production of NO and subsequent activation of soluble guanylate cyclase (GC-S) in the lumbar spinal cord appears to be required for maintenance of the thermal hyperalgesia produced in persistent pain models. As our knowledge and understanding of the new and intriguing class of neurotransmitters typified by NO emerges, it is likely that the next few years of pain and analgesia research will focus on the cellular events underlying mechanisms of chronic pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology.
Moncada, S., Palmer, R. M., & Higgs, E. A. (1991) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(25)06663-3 · Cited by 15,525
A peripheral mononeuropathy in rat that produces disorders of pain sensation like those seen in man
Bennett, G. J., & Xie, Y.-K. (1988) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(88)90209-6 · Cited by 5,376
Cited by
The induction of pain: an integrative review
Millan, M. J. (1999) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00048-3 · Cited by 1,774
Nitric Oxide Signaling in the Central Nervous System
Garthwaite, J., & Boulton, C. L. (1995) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.003343 · Cited by 1,638
Models and Mechanisms of Hyperalgesia and Allodynia
Sandkühler, J. (2009) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00025.2008 · Cited by 1,148
Gases as biological messengers: nitric oxide and carbon monoxide in the brain
Dawson, T., & Snyder, S. (1994) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-09-05147.1994 · Cited by 1,043
Endogenous nitric oxide synthesis: Biological functions and pathophysiology
Bredt, D. S. (1999) · Free Radical Research · doi:10.1080/10715769900301161 · Cited by 796
Metadata
- Authors
- Meller, S. T., & Gebhart, G. F.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-136
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965948569
- Cited by
- 952
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 41.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitric oxide (NO) and nociceptive processing in the spinal cord. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(93)90124-8
- The paper
- Meller, S. T., & Gebhart, G. F. (1993). Nitric oxide (NO) and nociceptive processing in the spinal cord. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(93)90124-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.