Cited by 28Estrogen and related hormone effectsHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Sex differences in estrogen receptor binding in the rat hypothalamus: effects of subsaturating pulses of estradiol

Brown, Theodore J., Naftolin, Frederick, Maclusky, Neil J.·1992·Brain Research

Abstract

The effects of subsaturating pulses of estradiol on cell nuclear retention of estrogen receptors in brain regions of male and female rats were determined. In the first experiment, age-matched adrenalectomized/gonadectomized (ADX/GDX) rats were killed 1 h after i.v. injection of a subsaturating dose of free estradiol (1.0 microgram/kg b. wt.) and cell nuclear estrogen receptor binding was measured in microdissected brain areas by an in vitro exchange assay. As we have previously reported with saturating doses of estradiol (3.6-36.0 micrograms/kg b. wt.), a greater concentration of receptors was measured in the ventromedial nucleus (VMN), periventricular preoptic area (PVPOA), and medial preoptic area (mPOA) of the female than in the same regions of the male brain. Binding levels did not differ between the sexes in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, arcuate nucleus, or the corticomedial amygdala. In the second experiment, GDX/ADX male and female rats received either a single or double pulse of 0.5 microgram estradiol/kg b. wt. administered 6 h apart. Rats were killed 1 h after the second pulse. In animals treated with a single pulse of estradiol 1 h before sacrifice, higher concentrations of estrogen binding were measured in the female VMN and PVPOA than in the male. Except in the mPOA, the concentration of estrogen receptor binding measured was not different from that measured in animals that had received an additional, earlier pulse of estradiol. In this area, receptor…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90239-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, T. J., Naftolin, F., & Maclusky, N. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Theodore J.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-04
Volume
578
Issue
1-2
Pages
129-134
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973415248
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd013587-14)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 13587)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
estrogen receptor binding, sex differences, hypothalamus, cytosolic estrogen receptor, ventromedial hypothalamus, preoptic area, medial preoptic area, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, arcuate nucleus, corticomedial amygdala, gonadectomy, adrenalectomy
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Cell Nucleus, Cytosol, Estradiol, Female, Hypothalamus, Male, Organ Specificity, Rats, Inbred Strains, Receptors, Estrogen, Sex Characteristics, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review