CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 391Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A two-trial memory task with automated recording: study in young and aged rats

Dellu, F., Mayo, W., Cherkaoui, J., Le Moal, M., Simon, H.·1992·Brain Research
DOI 10.1016/0006-8993(92)91352-f
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A two-trial recognition task, based on place or object exploration in a Y-maze, was developed to study memory in adult and aged rats. This paradigm avoids the use of electric shocks or deprivation that may have non-specific influences on the responses, and the task does not require learning of a rule. A number of behavioral parameters in several animals could be recorded automatically. These behavioral parameters were found to be differently influenced both by the type of recognition (place vs. object) and by the inter-trial interval (recognition retention time). Impaired recognition was also detected in 18-months-old rats. This recognition task which combines simplicity, sensitivity and high specificity may thus be a useful adjunct to our current battery of memory tasks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(92)91352-f

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 391

Related

Metadata

Authors
Dellu, F., Mayo, W., Cherkaoui, J., Le Moal, M., & Simon, H.
Affiliations
Université de Bordeaux (FR)
Corresponding author
Simon, H.
ORCID
Mayo, W.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-08
Volume
588
Issue
1
Pages
132-139
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0006-8993(92)91352-f
OpenAlex
W1984139645
Cited by
390
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
recognition memory, Y-maze, place recognition, object recognition, aging, aged rats, memory impairment, intertrial interval
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Discrimination, Psychological, Exploratory Behavior, Male, Memory, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review