Description of interaction processes in agitated liquid-liquid dispersions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prince and Blanch [273] report that the model of Coulaloglou and Tavlarides [244] delivers break-up rates that are several orders of magnitude smaller than their experimental results, and claim that Coulaloglou and Tavlarides did not take the density of the liquid phase into account.
“However, they report that the model of Coulaloglou and Tavlarides [244] delivers break-up rates that are several orders of magnitude smaller than their experimental results [273]. Prince and Blanch claim that Coulaloglou and Tavlarides did not take the density of the liquid phase into account.”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [244]
Coulaloglou and Tavlarides [244] proposed a breakage model based on turbulent flow conditions, assuming locally isotropic turbulent flow, energy spectrum proportional to the power of -5/3 to the wavenumber k, negligible viscous effects, and local pressure fluctuations leading to drop deformation.
“They proposed a breakage model based on turbulent flow conditions. The turbulent flow is assumed to be locally isotropic, the energy spectrum function is proportional to the power of -5 3 to the wavenumber k , viscous effects are negligible, and local pressure fluctuations lead to a drop deformation.”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [244]
The main assumption of the Coulaloglou and Tavlarides model is that an oscillating drop fragments if the turbulent eddies that hit the fluid particles possess an amount of kinetic energy greater than the drop surface energy, and it is assumed that the droplet sizes formed after breakage follow a normal density distribution function.
“The main assumption of their model is that an oscillating drops fragment if the turbulent eddies that hit the fluid particles posseses an amount of kinetic energy greater than the drop surface energy. It is assumed that the droplet sizes formed after the breakage follow a normal density distribution function.”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [244]
Coulaloglou and Tavlarides [244] assume that colliding droplets must remain in contact for a sufficiently long time so that drainage, film rupture, and coalescence may occur.
“In the coalescence model of Coulaloglou and Tavlarides [244] it is assumed that colliding droplets must remain in contact for a sufficiently long time, so that the processes of drainage, film rupture, and coalescence may occur.”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [244]
In Coulaloglou and Tavlarides [244], turbulent eddies may separate droplets and hinder coalescence.
“During the coalescence process, turbulent eddies may separate droplets and hinder coalescence.”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [244]
Tsouris and Tavlarides [275] proposed a modification of the Coulaloglou and Tavlarides model [244].
“Tsouris and Tavlarides [275] proposed a modification of the Coulaloglou and Tavlarides model [244].”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [244]
An expression for the collision rate of drops can be formulated assuming locally isotropic turbulent flow and that collisions among drops resemble collisions among molecules.
“An expression for the collision rate of drops can be formulated assuming locally isotropic turbulent flow and that collisions among drops resemble the collisions among molecules, similar to what happens in the kinetic theory of gases.”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [244]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 1,245
- Authors
- Coulaloglou, C. A., & Tavlarides, L. L.
- Affiliations
- Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tavlarides, L.L.
- ORCID
- Tavlarides, L.L.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1977
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1289-1297
- ISSN
- 0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979210241
- Cited by
- 1,245
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemical Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
- Keywords
- droplet breakup, droplet coalescence, liquid-liquid dispersions, breakage rate, coalescence rate, population balance equation, droplet size distribution, mixing frequency, interfacial area, phenomenological model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review