Rigorous charge conservation for local electromagnetic field solvers
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is important to be able to predict the specific energy acquired per electron from the electric field in the context of electron energization.
“It is also important to be able to predict the specific energy acquired per electron from the electric field in the context of electron energization, i.e., production of electrons with energy above the ionization threshold 141-143 .”
From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [143]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
VORPAL: a versatile plasma simulation code
Nieter, C., & Cary, J. R. (2004) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2003.11.004 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
The plasma simulation code: A modern particle-in-cell code with patch-based load-balancing
Germaschewski, K., Fox, W., Abbott, S., Ahmadi, N., Maynard, K., Wang, L., Ruhl, H., & Bhattacharjee, A. (2016) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.05.013 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms
Taccogna, F., Cichocki, F., Eremin, D., Fubiani, G., & Garrigues, L. (2023) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0153862 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Villasenor, J., & Buneman, O.
- Affiliations
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Computer Physics Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 306-316
- ISSN
- 0010-4655 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041577599
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer Physics Communications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
- Keywords
- charge conservation, electromagnetic field solver, plasma simulation, divergence equation, current density, electric field, magnetic field, charge movement, three dimensions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
