The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Self-citation
Cited by
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/096228029900800204 · Cited by 9,619
Self-citationBoateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 · Cited by 5,925
Toward ubiquitous blood pressure monitoring via pulse transit time: Theory and practice
Mukkamala, R., Hahn, J.-O., Inan, O. T., Mestha, L. K., Kim, C.-S., Toreyin, H., & Kyal, S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2015.2441951 · Cited by 935
“lation coefficient is often higher for wider BP ranges, whereas the root-mean-squared error (RMSE) is typically lower for narrower BP ranges [201], [202].”
BackgroundAssessing intrarater, interrater, and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements
Rousson, V., Gasser, T., & Seifert, B. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1253 · Cited by 415
Test-retest reliability of evoked BOLD signals from a cognitive-emotive fMRI test battery.
Plichta, M. M., Schwarz, A. J., Grimm, O., Morgen, K., Mier, D., Haddad, L., Gerdes, A. B. M., Sauer, C., Tost, H., Esslinger, C., et al. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.129 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G.
- Venue
- Computers in Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 337-340
- ISSN
- 0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025487319
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0010-4825(90)90013-f
- The paper
- Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1990). A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Computers in Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4825(90)90013-f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
