Cited by 415Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMultidisciplinary Science and Engineering Research

Assessing intrarater, interrater, and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements

Rousson, Valentin, Gasser, Theo, Seifert, Burkhardt·2002·Statistics in Medicine

Abstract

In this paper we review the problem of defining and estimating intrarater, interrater and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements. We argue that the usual notion of product-moment correlation is well adapted in a test-retest situation, whereas the concept of intraclass correlation should be used for intrarater and interrater reliability. The key difference between these two approaches is the treatment of systematic error, which is often due to a learning effect for test-retest data. We also consider the reliability of a sum and a difference of variables and illustrate the effects on components. Further, we compare these approaches of reliability with the concept of limits of agreement proposed by Bland and Altman (for evaluating the agreement between two methods of clinical measurements) and show how product-moment correlation is related to it. We then propose new kinds of limits of agreement which are related to intraclass correlation. A test battery to study the development of neuro-motor functions in children and adolescents illustrates our purpose throughout the paper.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.1253

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rousson, V., Gasser, T., & Seifert, B.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Rousson, Valentin
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10-24
Volume
21
Issue
22
Pages
3431-3446
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
OpenAlex
W2057591576
Cited by
415
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 20
FWCI
10.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Statistics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Multidisciplinary Science and Engineering Research
Keywords
intra-rater reliability, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, continuous measurement, product moment correlation, intraclass correlation coefficient, systematic errors, learning effects, limits of agreement, test battery, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Skills, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Observer Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review