The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. II. Effects of lesions
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Discrete lesions of the brain stem auditory pathway in cats were found to have complex effects on the auditory brain stem response (ABR). These effects ranged from an amplitude change on only a single component of the ABR to latency and amplitude changes for that component plus some or all of the subsequent components. Lesions of certain portions of the classical primary auditory pathway (i.e., the dorsal cochlear nucleus, the dorsal acoustic stria, the lateral superior olivary nucleus, the posterior portion of the lateral lemniscus and the inferior colliculus) were not associated with changes in the ABR prior to component P5. Except for midline lesions, the effects of a brain stem lesion on the ABR were quite different for ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation. The predominant effect of brain stem lesions on the ABR was an attenuation of the amplitudes of the components and only an occasional increase in their latency. Opposite effects, i.e., increases in amplitude or decreases in latency, were rare. The acute effects of brain stem lesions on the ABR could be transient and not persist in chronic recordings. The components of the ABR were primarily affected by the following lesions. Component P0.8 was attenuated by a lesion of the eighth nerve. N1.0, P1.2 and N1.5 were unaffected by lesions of the cochlear nucleus but were affected by lesions of the eighth nerve, suggesting that the eighth nerve was the generator of these components. Except for one lesion of the trapezoid body component P1.7 was only affected by lesions of the cochlear nucleus or eighth nerve, suggesting its origin in one or both of these structures. N2.0 was affected by lesions of the ventral cochlear nucleus, the region of the superior olivary complex and the trapezoid body. P3 was affected by lesions in the region of the superior olivary complex and the trapezoid body. N3 and N4 were affected primarily by lesions of the lateral lemniscus, but also by lesions of the superior olivary complex and trapezoid body. The results suggest that except for the first few components (P0.8, N1.0, P1.2 and N1.5) each of the components has substantial contributions from more than one auditory brain stem structure. Component P0.8 was determined to have substantial contributions from both cochlear microphonic and neural activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evoked Potentials in Clinical Medicine
Chiappa, K. H., & Ropper, A. H. (1982) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198205203062004 · Cited by 1,155
Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings
Achor, L. J., & Starr, A. (1980) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(80)90301-6 · Cited by 266
Self-citationBadi, A. N., Hillman, T., Shelton, C., & Normann, R. A. (2002) · Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/archotol.128.9.1019 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Achor, L. J., & Starr, A.
- Venue
- Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 174-190
- ISSN
- 0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095134449
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. II. Effects of lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0013-4694(80)90302-8
- The paper
- Achor, L. J., & Starr, A. (1980). Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. II. Effects of lesions. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(80)90302-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.