Cited by 30Hearing Loss and RehabilitationNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

A Technique for Implantation of a 3-Dimensional Penetrating Electrode Array in the Modiolar Nerve of Cats and Humans

Badi, Arunkumar N., Hillman, Todd, Shelton, Clough, Normann, Richard A.·2002·Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We believe that direct intraneural stimulation of the modiolar nerve using an array of electrodes will have lower thresholds, offer greater frequency selectivity and more stimulation sites, and have a greater frequency representation than conventional cochlear implants. OBJECTIVES: To describe a potential auditory prosthesis based on electrical stimulation of the modiolar cochlear nerve and to report the development of a surgical approach in human and animal models. DESIGN: Cadaveric human and animal studies conducted in temporal bones indicated that an array of penetrating microelectrodes could be implanted in the modiolar nerve. Cat studies using anesthesia were performed to develop the surgical procedure in an animal model. Nerve viability was assessed by measurement of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses at different stages of the surgery. SUBJECTS: Two fresh cadaveric human temporal bones, 3 cat cadavers, 1 pig cadaver, and 6 anesthetized cats were used in the experiments. RESULTS: We were able to implant arrays containing 20 microelectrodes in the human modiolar nerve after exposure by a modified extended facial recess approach. In animals, the modiolar nerve was accessed by the transbulla and the middle fossa approach. The cat was chosen as the appropriate animal model, and the transbulla approach was selected. The round window was exposed by ventral access to the bulla and after cochleostomy; drilling the modiolar bone exposed the modiolar nerve. The mean +/- SD diameter of the exposed nerve in cats was 1.64 +/- 0.07 mm (n = 9), and the mean +/- SD exposed length was 2.50 +/- 0.11 mm (n = 9); this is adequate to accommodate 20 microelectrodes. The electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses indicated nerve survival during and after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical technique allows implantation of up to 20 microelectrodes in the cat and human modiolar nerve. The nerve survives the surgical procedure. This work enables studies in the electrophysiological properties and consequences of long-term implantation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archotol.128.9.1019

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors developed a novel, high electrode-density (25 electrodes/mm2), high electrode-count (48-96 electrodes) penetrating neural interface designed for stimulation and recording in sub-millimeter neuroanatomical structures, such as small diameter nerves (<2 mm).

    “We have developed a novel, high electrode-density (25 electrodes/mm 2 ), high electrode-count (48-96 electrodes) penetrating neural interface, designed for use in stimulation and recording in sub-millimeter neuroanatomical structures, such as small diameter nerves (<2 mm) like the rat sciatic [37], feline pudendal [38], or feline/human cochlear nerves [46].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Badi, A. N., Hillman, T., Shelton, C., & Normann, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Normann, Richard A.
Venue
Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
128
Issue
9
Pages
1019
ISSN
0886-4470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969874650
Cited by
30
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (N01-DC-1-2108)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
auditory prosthesis, cochlear implant alternative, electrically evoked auditory brainstem response, surgical implantation technique, cat model, cadaveric temporal bone
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Cochlear Nerve, Disease Models, Animal, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electrophysiology, Feasibility Studies, Hearing Disorders, Humans, Swine, Temporal Bone, Prosthesis Implantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review