The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings
Open accessAbstract
A spatial and temporal analysis of auditory evoked potentials within the brain stem were performed in cats to determine the areas of the brain stem having large amplitude voltage fields, corresponding in latency to each of the components of the scalp-recorded auditory brain stem response (ABR). On the basis of this criterion, the first few components (occurring within 2 msec post-stimulus) were attributed to activity in a single structure, the eighth nerve. In contrast, each of the other components was correlated with large amplitude fields in at least two sites within the brain stem auditory pathways. The findings demonstrate a complex spatial and temporal distribution of electrical events within the auditory brain stem pathways, which preclude any simple one-to-one relationship between a given anatomical site and a particular component of the ABR. The possibility that the determination of the generators might be influenced by filtering of the evoked potentials was also examined. High-pass filtering of the evoked potentials resulted in a modification of the defined generators for only one of the components studied (P4). Filtering had little effect on the components of the scalp-recorded ABR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AUDITORY-EVOKED FAR FIELDS AVERAGED FROM THE SCALP OF HUMANS
JEWETT, D. L., & WILLISTON, J. S. (1971) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/94.4.681 · Cited by 1,188
Auditory Brain Stem Responses in Neurological Disease
Starr, A., & Achor, L. J. (1975) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1975.00490530083009 · Cited by 722
Self-citationFar-Field Acoustic Response: Origins in the Cat
Buchwald, J. S., & Huang, C.-M. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1145206 · Cited by 680
Clinical and pathologic correlates of brain stem auditory response abnormalities
Stockard, J. J., & Rossiter, V. S. (1977) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.27.4.316 · Cited by 592
Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. II. Effects of lesions
Achor, L. J., & Starr, A. (1980) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(80)90302-8 · Cited by 222
Self-citationHumphrey, D. R. (1968) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(68)90152-1 · Cited by 180
Cited by
Evoked Potentials in Clinical Medicine
Chiappa, K. H., & Ropper, A. H. (1982) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198205203062004 · Cited by 1,155
Electrophysiology of Cognition
Hillyard, S. A., & Picton, T. W. (1987) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010513 · Cited by 391
Banoub, M., Tetzlaff, J. E., & Schubert, A. (2003) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-200309000-00029 · Cited by 299
Badi, A. N., Hillman, T., Shelton, C., & Normann, R. A. (2002) · Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/archotol.128.9.1019 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Achor, L. J., & Starr, A.
- Venue
- Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 154-173
- ISSN
- 0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973233225
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 19.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0013-4694(80)90301-6
- The paper
- Achor, L. J., & Starr, A. (1980). Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(80)90301-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.