Cited by 96Neuroscience and Music PerceptionParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

Automatic auditory discrimination is impaired in Parkinson’s disease

Pekkonen, Eero, Jousmäki, Veikko, Reinikainen, Kalevi, Partanen, Juhani·1995·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Deviant tones embedded in a sequence of standard tones elicit an event-related potential (ERP) component called the mismatch negativity (MMN), which reflects automatic stimulus change detection in the human auditory system. To determine whether stimulus change detection is impaired in Parkinson's disease (PD), we recorded ERPs in 13 non-demented patients with PD and in 11 age-matched healthy control subjects both when tones were attended and when they were unattended. The difference area between deviant and standard ERPs was used to evaluate the MMN in the 'unattended' condition. The MMN was significantly smaller in patients with PD than in controls. In the attended condition, the amplitudes of both N1 and the N2 complex were smaller in the patient group than in controls. MMN attenuation suggests that PD patients have impaired automatic stimulus change detection compared with healthy controls. This might be caused by dopamine deficiency in PD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00304-4

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At the EEG, MMN duration, but not frequency, is negatively correlated with aging, resulting in impaired predictive errors.

    “at the EEG, MMN duration, but not frequency, is nega­ tively correlated with aging, resulting in impaired predictive errors (Pekkonen et al., 1995).”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as Pekkonen et al., 1995

  • Individuals with Parkinson's disease showed impaired predictive coding compared to HC.

    “individuals with Parkinson ' s disease showed impaired predictive coding compared to HC (Minks et al., 2014; Pek­ konen et al., 1995).”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as Pekkonen et al., 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pekkonen, E., Jousmäki, V., Reinikainen, K., & Partanen, J.
Affiliations
  • Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Pekkonen, Eero
Venue
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-07
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
47-52
ISSN
0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984731315
Cited by
96
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, mismatch negativity, auditory deviance detection, event-related potentials, auditory attention, dopamine deficiency, auditory processing deficits
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Reaction Time, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review