The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A theoretical and experimental study of high resolution EEG based on surface Laplacians and cortical imaging
Open accessAbstract
Two different methods to improve the spatial resolution of EEG are discussed: the surface Laplacian (e.g., current source density) and cortical imaging (e.g., spatial deconvolution). The former methods tend to be independent of head volume conductor model, whereas the latter methods are more model-dependent. Computer simulation of scalp potentials due to either a few isolated sources or 4200 distributed cortical sources and studies of actual EEG data both indicate that the two methods provide similar estimates of cortical potential distribution. Typical correlation coefficients between either spline-Laplacian or cortical image and simulated (calculated) cortical potential are in the 0.8-0.95 range, depending partly on CSF thickness. By contrast, correlation coefficients between simulated scalp and cortical potential are in the 0.4-0.5 range, suggesting that high resolution methods provide much better estimates of cortical potential than is obtained with conventional EEG. The two methods are also applied to steady-state visually evoked potentials and spontaneous EEG. Correlation coefficients obtained from real EEG data are in the same general ranges as correlations obtained from simulations. The new high resolution methods can provide a dramatic increase in the information content of EEG and appear to have widespread application in both clinical and cognitive studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping
Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6 · Cited by 2,706
Finite-element model of the human head: scalp potentials due to dipole sources
Yan, Y., Nunez, P. L., & Hart, R. T. (1991) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02442317 · Cited by 208
Self-citation
Cited by
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00057-3 · Cited by 7,927
Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback
Sitaram, R., Ros, T., Stoeckel, L., Haller, S., Scharnowski, F., Lewis-Peacock, J., Weiskopf, N., Blefari, M. L., Rana, M., Oblak, E., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.164 · Cited by 1,306
The sleep slow oscillation as a traveling wave
Massimini, M., Huber, R., Ferrarelli, F., Hill, S., & Tononi, G. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1318-04.2004 · Cited by 1,221
Topographic ERP Analyses: A Step-by-Step Tutorial Review
Murray, M. M., Brunet, D., & Michel, C. M. (2008) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-008-0054-5 · Cited by 1,127
Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication
McFarland, D. J., McCane, L. M., David, S. V., & Wolpaw, J. R. (1997) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00022-2 · Cited by 936
Metadata
- Authors
- Nunez, P. L., Silberstein, R. B., Cadusch, P. J., Wijesinghe, R. S., Westdorp, A. F., & Srinivasan, R.
- Venue
- Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-57
- ISSN
- 0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056144146
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A theoretical and experimental study of high resolution EEG based on surface Laplacians and cortical imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0013-4694(94)90112-0
- The paper
- Nunez, P. L., Silberstein, R. B., Cadusch, P. J., Wijesinghe, R. S., Westdorp, A. F., & Srinivasan, R. (1994). A theoretical and experimental study of high resolution EEG based on surface Laplacians and cortical imaging. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(94)90112-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.