The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dimensions of illiteracy, 1750–1850
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Why Isn't the Whole World Developed?
Easterlin, R. A. (1981) · The Journal of Economic History · doi:10.1017/s0022050700042674 · Cited by 624
The Condition of the Working Class in England, 1209–2004
Clark, G. (2005) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/498123 · Cited by 615
British Economic Growth, 1270–1870
Broadberry, S., Campbell, B., Klein, A., Overton, M., & van Leeuwen, B. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107707603 · Cited by 554
Das Human-Kapital: A Theory of the Demise of the Class Structure
GALOR, O., & MOAV, O. (2006) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2006.00370.x · Cited by 469
From Stagnation to Growth: Unified Growth Theory
Galor, O. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.651526 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Schofield, R. S.
- Venue
- Explorations in Economic History
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1973-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 437-454
- ISSN
- 0014-4983 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063707177
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dimensions of illiteracy, 1750–1850. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0014-4983(73)90026-0
- The paper
- Schofield, R. S. (1973). Dimensions of illiteracy, 1750–1850. Explorations in Economic History. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4983(73)90026-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
