Cited by 61Drug Transport and Resistance MechanismsGastrointestinal motility and disordersIon Transport and Channel Regulation

Effect of colonic perfusion with sulfated and nonsulfated bile acids on mucosal structure and function in the rat

Open access
Breuer, Norbert F., Rampton, David S., Tammar, Anthony, Murphy, Gerard M., Dowling, R.Hermon·1983·Gastroenterology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-5085(83)90199-3

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The gut microbiota may influence functional constipation through its impact on bile acid sulfation, in which colonic bacterial bile salt sulfatase may desulfate bile acids, empowering their effect to stimulate colonic secretion and transit and consequently improve colonic fluid transport.

    “Another mechanism for the gut microbiota to influence FC is through its impact on BA sulfation, which abolishes the effect of the BAs on fluid transport [ 51 , 52 ]. BA sulfation likely occurred in hepatocytes, while colonic bacterial bile salt sulfatase may desulfate BA, empowering its effect to stimulate colonic secretion and transit, and consequently improve colonic fluid transport [ 53 ].”

    From Role of gut microbiota in functional constipation (2021) · cites this paper as [52]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Breuer, N. F., Rampton, D. S., Tammar, A., Murphy, G. M., & Dowling, R. H.
Affiliations
University College Hospital (GB)
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-05
Volume
84
Issue
5
Pages
969-977
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4300228569
Cited by
61
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
Keywords
sulfated bile acids, colonic mucosa, deoxycholic acid, chenodeoxycholic acid, cholic acid, water and electrolyte transport, sodium uptake, mucosal injury
MeSH terms
Animals, Bile Acids and Salts, Biological Transport, Chenodeoxycholic Acid, Cholic Acids, Colon, Deoxycholic Acid, Diarrhea, DNA, Intestinal Mucosa, Ion Channels, Mucus, Perfusion, Proteins, Water-Electrolyte Balance, Cholic Acid, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review