Cited by 98Gastrointestinal motility and disordersEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryFood composition and properties

Emptying of the terminal ileum in intact humans

Open access
Spiller, R.C., Brown, M.L., Phillips, S.F.·1987·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Emptying of the terminal ileum was assessed in 15 healthy humans by injecting technetium 99m-diethyltriaminopentaacetic acid into the bowel through a multilumen orocolonic tube. The subsequent arrival of isotope in the colon was quantified by gamma-scintigraphy and colonic filling curves were obtained. Studies were performed during fasting (n = 5) cnd 2.5 h after either a low residue meal (n = 5) or a meal made high in residue (n = 5) by adding 4 g of guar. The time for 50% of the isotope to reach the colon (T50) was significantly accelerated after both meals, being 72 +/- 15 min for the high residue meal and 62 +/- 8 min for the low residue meal, compared with 183 +/- 37 min (p less than 0.01) in the 5 fasting subjects. Although the addition of guar did not alter T50 significantly, it did cause a significant fall in the rate of colonic filling, implying increased isotope dilution. Delay at the ileocolonic junction, as shown by plateaus in the middle of the colonic filling curves, was uncommon. Hold-up was significant in only 2 of 10 postprandial and 2 of 5 fasting studies. Rates of ileocolonic transit could not be related to either a mean ileal motility index or the occurrence of specific ileal motor patterns immediately proximal to the ileocolonic junction. Fasting ileocolonic transit was characteristically erratic but could not be related to interdigestive migrating motor complexes, which were rarely observed in the last 60 cm of ileum. We conclude that ileocolonic transit in humans is related to the rate at which material accumulates in the ileum, being rapid postprandially (when ileal flow is high) and slow and erratic during fasting. This method yields consistent results and could be used to define further factors that influence ileocolonic inflow.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90024-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with IBS exhibit comparable increases in small intestinal water content and colonic volume to FODMAPs to those seen in healthy individuals, but symptomatic responses are greater in IBS, supporting the role of visceral hypersensitivity.

    “Patients with IBS exhibit comparable increases in small intestinal water content and colonic volume to FODMAPs to those seen in healthy individuals, but symptomatic responses are greater in IBS, supporting the role of visceral hypersensitivity. 35”

    From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [35]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Phillips SF, Giller J. The contribution of the colon to electro- lyte and water conservation in man. J Lab Clin Med 1973;81:733-46.
  2. Debongnie JC, Phillips SF. Capacity of the human colon to absorb fluid. Gastroenterology 1978;74:698-703.
  3. Kerlin P, Zinsmeister A, Phillips S. Relationship of motility to flow of contents in the human small intestine. Gastroenterol- ogy 1982;82:701-6.
  4. Stephen AM, Haddad AC, Phillips SF. Passage of carbohy- drate into the colon. Direct measurements in humans. Gastro- enterology 1983;85:589-95.
  5. Hertz AF. The ileocecal sphincter. J Physiol 1913;47:54-6.
  6. Pirk F. Changes in motility of the small intestine in digestive disorders. Gut 1967;8:486-90.
  7. Bueno L, Praddaude F, Fioramonti J, Ruckebusch Y. Effect of dietary fiber on gastrointestinal motility and jejunal transit time in dogs. Gastroenterology 1981;80:701-7.
  8. Spiller GA, Chernoff MC, Hill RA, Gates JE, Nassar JT, Shipley EA. Effect of purified cellulose, pectin and a low-residue diet on fecal volatile fatty acids, transit time, and fecal weight in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 1980;33:754-9.
  9. Spiller RC, Brown ML, Phillips SF, Azpiroz F. Scintigraphic measurements of canine ileocolonic transit: direct and indi- rect effects of eating. Gastroenterology 1986;91:1213-20.
  10. Code CF, Schlegel JF. The gastrointestinal interdigestive housekeeper: motor correlates of the interdigestive myoelec- tric complex of the dog. In: Daniel EE, ed. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Gastrointestinal Motil- ity. Vancouver: Mitchell Press, 1974:631-4.
  11. Quigley EMM, Borody TJ, Wienbeck M, Haddad AC, Tucker RL, Phillips SF. Motility of the terminal ileum and ileocecal sphincter in healthy man. Gastroenterology 1984;87:857-66.
  12. Meyer JH, Gu YG, Dressman J, Amidon G. Effect of viscosity and flow rate on gastric emptying of solids (abstr). Gastroen- terology 1985;88:1501.
  13. Stephen AM, Cummings JH. Water holding by dietary fiber in vitro and its relationship to fecal output in man. Gut 1979;20:722-9.
  14. Quigley EMM, Phillips SF, Dent J. Myoelectric activity and intraluminal pressure of the canine ileocecal sphincter. Gas- troenterology 1983;85:1054-62.
  15. Nasmyth DG, Williams NS. Pressure characteristics of the human ileocecal region-a key to its function. Gastroenterol- ogy 1985;84:345-51.
  16. Ritchie JA, Salam SW. Upper intestinal motility in ulcerative colitis, idiopathic steatorrhea, and the irritable bowel syn- drome. Gut 1965;6:325-37.
  17. Deller DJ, Wangel AG. Intestinal motility in man. I. A study combining the use of intraluminal pressure recordings and cineradiology. Gastroenterology 1965;48:45-57.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spiller, R. C., Brown, M. L., & Phillips, S. F.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-03
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
724-729
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W24460488
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Gastroenterological Association
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01am032121-03, 3p30am034988-01s1)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-585)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
dietary fiber, Cyamopsis tetragonoloba, ileal motility, migrating motor complex, Tc-99m DTPA
MeSH terms
Adult, Colon, Dietary Fiber, Pentetic Acid, Fasting, Female, Food, Galactans, Gastrointestinal Motility, Humans, Ileum, Male, Mannans, Technetium, Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate, Plant Gums

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review