Cited by 165CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition

The dolomitization of CaCO3: an experimental study at 252–295°C

Katz, Amitai, Matthews, Alan·1977·Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-7037(77)90238-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Solution-recrystallization is an effective mechanism for dolomitization.

    “Alternatively, solution-recrystallization is an effective mechanism for the dolomitization (Epstein et al., 1964; Katz and Matthews, 1977).”

    From Oxygen isotope fractionation in carbonate and sulfate minerals. (1999) · cites this paper as Katz and Matthews, 1977

  • Most experimental inorganic dolomite formation studies have quantified dolomitization of calcite, other Ca-Mg carbonates, or followed proto-dolomite crystallization or dolomite growth on carbonate seed crystals, mimicking diagenetic processes.

    “Most experimental inorganic dolomite formation studies have quantified the 'dolomitization' of calcite (Gaines 1977; Katz and Matthews 1977; Miura and Kawabe 2000; Nordeng and Sibley 1994; Kaczmarek and Sibley 2007), other Ca-Mg carbonates (Katz and Matthews 1977; Zempolich and Baker 1993; Sibley et al. 1994), or followed proto-dolomite crystallization (Malone et al. 1996) or dolomite growth (Gain”

    From A route for the direct crystallization of dolomite (2015) · cites this paper as Katz and Matthews 1977

  • The crystallization was proposed to be influenced primarily by temperature, reacting mineralogy, solutions/environment chemistry, and reacting surface area.

    “Thus, the crystallization was proposed to be influenced primarily by: (i) temperature, (ii) reacting mineralogy, (iii) solutions/environment chemistry and (iv) reacting surface area.48,49”
  • The value of 31.9 kcal mol−1 is lower than the value of 42.1 kcal mol−1 obtained from Gaines (1968) and lower still than the published value of 49 kcal mol−1 from Katz and Matthews (1977).

    “The value of 31.9 kcal mol Ϫ1 is also lower than the value of 42.1 kcal mol Ϫ1 obtained from an analysis of unpublished data from Gaines (1968, rates computed from 220° 250°C; see also Arvidson and Mackenzie, 1997) which in turn is lower still than the only published value of 49 kcal mol Ϫ1 , determined from rates at temperatures from 252° to 295°C by Katz and Matthews (1977).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katz, A., & Matthews, A.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Venue
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1977-02
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
297-308
ISSN
0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021188476
Cited by
165
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (publishedVersion)
Funders
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Keywords
dolomitization, calcite, aragonite, magnesian calcite, hydrothermal alteration, dissolution-precipitation, activation energy, co-precipitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review