Cited by 432Marine and coastal ecosystemsHeavy metals in environmentEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Importance of heavy metal-organic matter interactions in natural waters

Reuter, J.H, Perdue, E.M·1977·Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-7037(77)90240-x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reuter, J. H., & Perdue, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Portland State University (US)
Venue
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1977-02
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
325-334
ISSN
0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1539935031
Cited by
432
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
15.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
dissolved organic matter, humic substances, metal complexation, organic ligands, trace metals, metal-humic complexes, river water chemistry, soil organic matter, major cations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review