Cited by 46Soil and Land Suitability AnalysisSoil Management and Crop YieldSoil Geostatistics and Mapping

A mixed qualitative/quantitative physical land evaluation methodology

Open access
van Lanen, H.A.J., Hack-ten Broeke, M.J.D., Bouma, J., de Groot, W.J.M.·1992·Geoderma

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-7061(92)90004-q

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Lanen, H. A. J., Hack-ten Broeke, M. J. D., Bouma, J., & de Groot, W. J. M.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Venue
Geoderma
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-10
Volume
55
Issue
1-2
Pages
37-54
ISSN
0016-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977633815
Cited by
46
References
29
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
15.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geoderma (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Keywords
land suitability, expert knowledge, decision tree, crop growth simulation, potato cultivation, soil maps, land quality, crop water deficit, tuber yield, geographic information systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review