Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: a review
Open accessAbstract
The potential of marginal lands to improve food security, support bioenergy production or ecosystem services has globally got a lot of attention. Defining agricultural marginal land is a task that involves more than just considering the land's quality, its definition changed a lot during the last two centuries. Development of new technologies and policy trends require the concepts of prime land and marginal land to be renewed from time to time. Although much research has been done on the concept of marginal land, it is currently limited by the lack of a clear, globally accepted definition. There are four major sources of criteria of marginal lands: economic (e.g., rent cost, land value), geographical (e.g., temperature, slope, precipitation), ecosystem-based (e.g., protected areas, recreation, ecosystem services), soil suitability (e.g., yield capability, physical and chemical soil properties). The categorisation of agricultural land into groups like productive, marginal or unproductive often depends on the cultivation or management type. Since conceptions of marginal land are dynamic both in time and space, flexible policy and practical solutions are needed for their non-degrading use, which in any case shall support nature-based socioeconomic development. To maintain the socioeconomic value of these areas, it is crucial to develop rural areas that are economically or biophysically marginalised. High nature value farming, bioenergy crops by sustainable land management and afforestation are highly recommended. Choosing the right management can transform marginal land into an optimal soil condition or incorrect management can degrade prime land into marginal land (unproductive land). This paper provides a review and categorisation of the historical and new developments of marginal land concepts especially those which are working with agricultural aspects, including land management and reclamation. It could give a strong basis for further research in topic of marginal land.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes historical and current concepts of agricultural marginal lands, showing that definitions depend on spatial scale, regional conditions, and intended use. It concludes that marginal lands are dynamic in time and space and require purpose-specific identification and flexible, site-specific management.
Key findings
- Marginal land is not a fixed category: the same site can be marginal for one purpose or place and productive for another; definitions vary across regions, countries, organizations, and objectives.
- The global marginal land class (marginally suitable and very marginally suitable) covers 2.7 billion ha worldwide, including 1.5 billion ha of unused land suitable for agricultural cultivation but currently not cultivated (IIASA/FAO GAEZ v3).
- Agriculture covers about 38% of Earth’s land surface (1.5 billion ha cropland and 3.4 billion ha pastures), and meeting projected 2050 food demand may require an additional 0.2–1 billion ha of agricultural land (Tilman et al., 2011).
- Marginal lands can be used for bioenergy, grazing/livestock, rural development, and ecosystem restoration; high nature value farming, bioenergy crops, and afforestation are recommended, but inappropriate use risks erosion, compaction, nitrogen leaching, and biodiversity changes. Bünemann et al. (2018) found that 40% of research articles (62 publications) used indicators such as total organic matter/carbon, pH, available P, water storage, bulk density, texture, available K, and total N.
Methods
- Design: comprehensive literature review of historical and new developments in agricultural marginal land concepts, land quality assessment, related indicators, and management/evaluation of marginal land types.
- Data/sample: no primary data were used; the synthesis draws on scientific literature, including a word cloud based on the first 100 Google Scholar articles on “marginal land” and a proposed indicator scheme covering soil, other environmental, and economic factors.
- Analysis: narrative synthesis and tabulation of definitions and attributes, with discussion of criteria systems and best practices for marginal land use.
Limitations
- The paper states no explicit limitations section; it notes that “No data was used for the research described in the article.”
- Evident from the text: as a review, conclusions depend on the selected literature and heterogeneous definitions; the word cloud is based on the first 100 Google Scholar articles and is not described as a systematic review.
- Evident: the review emphasizes that marginal land definitions and criteria differ by region, scale, and purpose, which limits a single universal classification.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 126 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The most frequently used terms in the 'marginal land' topic in the first 100 articles from Google Scholar are biomass, crops, species, breeding, mals, traits, yield, production, genetic and quality.
“The first five terms are biomass, crops, species, breeding, mals, traits, yield, production, genetic and quality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among these domains, most scientific articles in the last decade target the aspects of bioenergy production on marginal lands.
“Among these domains most of the scientific articles in the last decade (according to http://webofknowledge.com)target the aspects of bioenergy production on marginal lands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Criteria affecting yield, such as soil conditions including sodicity, salinity, water management and physical characteristics, are becoming primary indicators of marginality.
“Criteria affecting yield, such as soil conditions including sodicity, salinity, water management and physical characteristics are becoming primary indicators of marginality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Marginal lands (pastures) can be used for dairy production.
“Marginal lands (pastures) can be used for diary production”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Kernebeek et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Of the 2.7 billion ha of marginal land class worldwide, 1.5 billion ha is unused land suitable for agricultural cultivation but currently not cultivated.
“from which 1.5 billion ha is unused land which are suitable for agricultural cultivation, but currently not cultivated”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IIASA/FAO, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The same attributes that make a site marginal in one place or for one purpose might make land productive in another place or for a different reason.
“The same attributes that make a site “marginal” in one place or for one purpose might make land productive in another place or for a different reason (Dale et al., 2010;James, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dale et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites James, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Definitions of marginal land and its application domains differ across regions, countries, and organizations due to their different objectives.
“The definitions of marginal land and its application domains differ across regions, countries, and organizations due to their different objectives”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Baldock et al., 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dale et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites FAO, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Marginal land class (marginally suitable, very marginally suitable) covers 2.7 billion ha worldwide.
“Marginal land class (marginally suitable, very marginally suitable) cover 2.7 billion ha worldwide”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IIASA/FAO, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Before 1970 the aim of soil quality assessment was either the identification of suitability for crop growth or estimation of productivity.
“Before 1970 the aim of soil quality assessment was either the identification of suitability for crop growth or estimation of productivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bünemann et al. (2018) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the last 30 years the term marginal land is frequently used interchangeably with other terms such as unproductive lands, waste lands, underutilized lands, idle lands, abandoned lands, or degraded lands.
“In the last 30 years the term “marginal land” is frequently used interchangeably with other terms such as “unproductive lands,” “waste lands,” “underutilized lands,” “idle lands,” “abandoned lands,” or “degraded lands” (Dauber et al., 2012;FAO, 1976;Lal, 1991;Tógyer, 2012;Wiegmann et al., 2008)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Soil fertility classifications combining both qualitative and quantitative systems can be beneficial in supporting complex land use tasks.
“Soil fertility classifications combining both qualitative and quantitative systems (Hu et al., 1999;Riquier et al., 1970;Sys, 1985;Van Lanen et al., 1992) can be beneficial in supporting complex land use tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hu et al., 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Riquier et al., 1970
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sys, 1985
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Between 1990 and 2010 measures used soil quality test kits, biochemistry analysis and multivariate statistics to establish productivity, environment degradation and animal/human health indices.
“Between 1990 and 2010 measures used soil quality test kits, biochemistry analysis and multivariate statistics to establish productivity, environment degradation and animal/human health indices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bünemann et al. (2018) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Using degraded or marginal lands for biomass production is unlikely to be as effective at reducing carbon emissions as simply reforesting or reseeding the land and managing it as native cover.
“However, using degraded or marginal lands for biomass production is unlikely to be as effective at reducing carbon emissions as simply reforesting or reseeding the land and managing it as native cover (Fargione et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fargione et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The first more complex, multi factor-based land evaluation concept came from the FAO (1993) work, 'An international framework for evaluating sustainable land management'.
“The first more complex, multi factor-based land evaluation concept coming from the FAO (1993) work, 'An international framework for evaluating sustainable land management'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites FAO (1993)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The EU Joint Research Centre combined several biophysical criteria to delineate agricultural areas affected by specific constraints.
“The European Union's Joint Research Centre combined several biophysical criteria to delineate those agricultural areas which are affected by specific constraints (Jones et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The high sensitivity of marginal lands' ecological services has become a major source of concern.
“The high sensitivity of marginal lands' ecological services has become a major source of concern (Baldock et al., 1996;Dale et al., 2010; Wood et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Baldock et al., 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dale et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wood et al., 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Gopalakrishnan et al. (2011) identified marginal land resources based on soil health, land use and environmental degradation in Nebraska (USA).
“Gopalakrishnan et al. (2011) identified marginal land resources based on soil health, land use and environmental degradation in Nebraska (USA).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gopalakrishnan et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The FAO (1993) framework uses biophysical factors to classify land into groups.
“This framework uses biophysical factors to classify a land into groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites FAO (1993)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Land is also marginal when the nitrate level of groundwater exceeds 10 mg/L.
“Land is also marginal when the nitrate level of groundwater exceeds 10 mg/L.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gopalakrishnan et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
According to the review of Bünemann et al. (2018), 40% of research articles (62 publications) use the following indicators in descending order: total organic matter/carbon, pH, available P, water storage, bulk density, texture, available K and total N.
“According to the review of Bünemann et al. (2018), 40% of research articles (62 publications) use the following indicators (in descending order): total organic matter/carbon, pH, available P, water storage, bulk density, texture, available K and total N.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bünemann et al. (2018) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Large areas of land have been used to feed livestock, mostly used for grazing or feed production.
“Nevertheless large areas of land have been used to feed livestock (Mottet et al., 2017), mostly used for grazing or feed production.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mottet et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There are few opportunities for farmers to make a living on marginal land.
“Another issue is that there are few opportunities for farmers to make a living on marginal land (Benayas et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Benayas et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
WOCAT has several best practice examples for ecosystem restoration in marginal land area.
“The World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies for Sustainable Land Management has several best practice examples for ecosystem restoration in marginal land area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites WOCAT
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In Latvia, Abolina and Luzadis (2015) made experiments in abandoned lands with short rotation woody crop cultivation.
“In Latvia, Abolina and Luzadis (2015) made experiments in abandoned lands with short rotation woody crop cultivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abolina and Luzadis (2015)
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 107
- May combine two claims. 46
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenMost research investigates marginal lands from the viewpoint of agricultural or arable land use.
“Most of the researches investigate marginal lands from the viewpoint of agricultural -or just arable -land use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenMany researchers and authors have defined the term marginal land over the last 200 years.
“As presented in the previous chapter, many researchers and authors have defined the term marginal land over the last 200 years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSome researchers use only economic parameters, some use only biophysical, and some use both.
“There are several types of these parameters, and some researcher use only economic, some use only biophysical and some use both.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMany authors have only defined marginal land in general terms while others have linked the delimitation of these lands to specific parameters.
“Many authors have only defined this phrase in general terms while others have linked the delimitation of these lands to specific parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMuch of the areas currently considered marginal could be removed from this category if used more efficiently.
“much of the areas currently considered as marginal could sort out from this category if used more efficiently”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMarginal land definitions depend on the spatial scale and the regional conditions.
“Marginal lands are depending on the spatial scale and the regional conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome affected areas are not only low in productivity but also have limits that prevent them from being used for traditional agricultural operations.
“Some of the affected areas are not only low in productivity, but also have limits that prevent them from being used for traditional agricultural operations (Hart, 2001;Jones et al., 2014;Schubert et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hart, 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jones et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schubert et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenPhysical and production marginality of lands are commonly used by soil scientists.
“Physical and production marginality of lands are commonly used by soil scientists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMarginal lands are dynamic both in time and space.
“Marginal lands are dynamic both in time and space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThese lands can be classified as Less Favoured Areas, which can be translated as marginal land.
“These lands can be classified as Less Favoured Areas, which can be translated as marginal land (Confalonieri et al., 2014;Jones et al., 2014)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Confalonieri et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jones et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTo meet projected food demand in 2050, an additional 0.2 to 1 billion ha of agricultural land may be required.
“To meet projected food demand in 2050, an additional 0.2 to 1 billion ha of agricultural land may be required (Tilman et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tilman et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenForest and grassland are land use types that very often take place on marginal lands and in many cases could be used as croplands.
“However, forest and grassland are land use types which very often take place on marginal lands and in many cases, they could be used as croplands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDue to environmental and mostly human impact, prime land can be degraded to marginal land or unproductive land, but marginal lands (or some unproductive lands) can be turned into productive land by appropriate land management or targeted amelioration.
“due to environmental and mostly human impact, a prime land can be degraded to marginal land or unproductive land, but the marginal lands (or some cases unproductive lands) can be turned into productive land by appropriate land management or targeted amelioration (Kang et al., 2013;WOCAT, 2022)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kang et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites WOCAT, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMarginal land can be turned suitable for the objective of the use.
“Marginal land can be turned suitable for the objective of the use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe term marginal land appears in the early 19th century in Ricardo's Theory of Rent.
“The term of marginal land shows up in the early 19th century in the Theory of Rent from Ricardo, D. (Ricardo, 1817).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ricardo, 1817
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe categorisation of lands into prime land, marginal land or unproductive land often depends just on the management or cultivation type of the land.
“The categorisation of lands into prime land, marginal land or unproductive land is often depends just on the management or cultivation type of the land.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGrazing with livestock actively helps to store carbon and to maximise use of marginal land and resources.
“Grazing with livestock actively helping to store carbon and to maximise use of marginal land and resources too (Garnett, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Garnett, 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningDefining marginal land is a complex task that may not be limited to the biophysical quality of the land.
“Defining marginal land is a complex task, which may not be limited to the biophysical quality of the land.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPeterson and Galbraith (1932) began to develop a new theory of marginal land types in detail in the context of a new, modern land use planning concept.
“Peterson and Galbraith, 1932 began to develop a new theory of marginal land types in detail in the context of a new, modern land use planning concept.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peterson and Galbraith, 1932
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenDefining marginal land is a complex task with a need to consider a series of land quality criteria.
“Defining marginal land is a complex task, with a need to consider a series of land quality criteria.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationQualitative systems group land based on specific land-use objectives and taking into account constraints.
“Qualitative systems group land based on specific land-use objectives and taking into account constraints (Dumanski and Onofrei, 1989;Sanchez et al., 1982).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dumanski and Onofrei, 1989
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sanchez et al., 1982 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAs James (2010) stated, marginal land is thought to be land that isn't being used for current production needs or is of such poor quality that it is unsuitable for modern intensive cropping systems.
“As James (2010) stated, marginal land is thought to be land that isn't being used for current production needs or is of such poor quality that it is unsuitable for modern intensive cropping systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites James (2010)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMarginal lands have been defined in Europe as land uses that are on the margin of economic viability.
“Marginal lands have been defined, on the one hand, in Europe as land uses that are on the margin of economic viability (Strijker, 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Strijker, 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDevelopment of land evaluation systems based on biophysical conditions started in the 20th century.
“Development of land evaluation systems based on biophysical conditions have been started in the 20th century”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBünemann et al. (2018) characterised soil quality concepts as having a continuous change.
“Bünemann et al. (2018) in their comprehensive review characterised soil quality concepts as having a continuous change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bünemann et al. (2018) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFrom 2010 the main objectives of soil quality assessment were multi-functionality, ecosystem services, resistance and resilience analysis with high-throughput methods.
“From 2010 the main objectives were the multi-functionality, ecosystem services, resistance and resilience analysis with high-throughput methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bünemann et al. (2018) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenSoil scientists frequently use physical marginality and production marginality of lands based on soil suitability and other limitations of land use.
“On the other hand, soil scientists frequently use physical marginality and production marginality of lands based on soil suitability and other limitations of land use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenDescriptive, qualitative systems usually provide quick but general answers about productivity potential.
“Descriptive, qualitative systems usually provide quick but general answers about productivity potential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccording to Burrough (1989), land evaluation models can be divided into three groups: empirical models, deterministic models and stochastic models.
“According to Burrough (1989), land evaluation models can be divided into three groups: empirical models, deterministic models and stochastic models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burrough (1989) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningWith the assessment of constraints and their weight in the success of agricultural production, marginal land can be distinguished from prime land.
“With the assessment of these constraints and their weight in the success of agricultural production, marginal land can be distinguished from prime land.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenRemote sensing is useful for identifying low-productivity land based on lands' biophysical characteristics.
“Although remote sensing is useful for identifying low-productivity land based on lands' biophysical characteristics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenEconomic marginality requires a much more flexible and dynamic characterization of all the social and economic factors that motivate rural policymakers to allocate their land to specific use.
“Since economic marginality requires a much more flexible and dynamic characterization of all the social and economic factors that motivate the rural policymakers to allocate their land to specific use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEsch et al. (2021, 2018) analysed the suitability of marginal lands for crop production in Canada.
“Esch et al. (2021Esch et al. ( , 2018) ) analysed the suitability of marginal lands for crop production in Canada.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Esch et al. (2021, 2018)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe main factors that limit crop production are insufficient climate, shallow topsoil, poor water management, over-watering, high salinity, erosion, steep slopes.
“The main factors that limit crop production are insufficient climate, shallow topsoil, poor water management, over-watering, high salinity, erosion, steep slopes (Da La Rosa and Magaldi, 1982;Haans and Heide, 1984;Klingebiel and Montgomery, 1961;Magaldi and Ronchetti, 1984).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Da La Rosa and Magaldi, 1982
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Haans and Heide, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Klingebiel and Montgomery, 1961
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLand evaluation methods can be qualitative, quantitative or a combination of the two in terms of land fertility.
“Land evaluation methods can be qualitative, quantitative or a combination of the two in terms of land fertility (Bouma, 1989).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bouma, 1989
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenLand evaluation is a key tool to categorise lands into prime, marginal or unproductive.
“Land evaluation is a key tool to categorise that.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenSoil quality assessment is one of the key components of land evaluation systems.
“Soil quality assessment is one of the key components of the land evaluation systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBetween 1970 and 1990 estimation of productivity levels remained the main objective for which soil quality indicators have been used.
“Between 1970 and 1990 estimation of productivity levels remain the main objective for which soil quality indicators have been used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bünemann et al. (2018) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccording to Khanna et al. (2021), marginal land definition for bioenergy is likely to encompass land that is biophysically poor and land that is currently idle/fallow, as well as land that is in crop production but losing soil organic matter, suffering from erosion or high nutrient run-off, or foregoing significant habitat value.
“marginal land definition for bioenergy is likely to encompass land that is biophysically poor and land that is currently idle/fallow (economically marginal land for food crops), as well as land that is in crop production but losing soil organic matter, suffering from erosion or high nutrient run-off, or foregoing significant habitat value (socially marginal land for food crops) (Khanna et al., 202”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Khanna et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenDeterministic models are based on well-known physical and chemical processes and their underlying physical rules.
“Deterministic models (or deterministic process models) are based on well-known physical and chemical processes and their underlying physical rules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenQuantitative land evaluation systems based on biophysical properties do not simply classify soils according to their suitability for crop production, but also describe the level of fertility with a relative value.
“Quantitative land evaluation systems, which are based on biophysical properties do not simply classify soils according to their suitability for crop production, but also describe the level of fertility, with a relative value.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe combination of descriptive and quantitative models provides a means that also takes into account the factors that play a role in achieving a given yield level.
“the combination of the two models provides a means of that also takes into account the factors that play a role in achieving a given yield level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBioenergy can have a double impact on marginal land, energy production and feed for livestock.
“Bioenergy can have a double impact on marginal land, energy production and feed for livestock (Helliwell, 2018;Mooney et al., 2015;Muscat et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccording to James (2010), biomass grown on marginal lands has the potential to be carbon neutral or even negative.
“According to the study of James (2010), biomass grown on marginal lands has the potential to be carbon neutral or even negative.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites James (2010)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRelying on the theory of qualitative classification, soils are grouped according to the similarity of limiting factors or constraints, the approach taken by many Western land evaluation systems.
“Relying on the theory of qualitative classification, it groups soils according to the similarity of limiting factors or constraints, the approach taken by many Western land evaluation systems (Klingebiel and Montgomery, 1961;Sanchez et al., 1982;Sys, 1985).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Klingebiel and Montgomery, 1961
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sanchez et al., 1982 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sys, 1985
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningFactors and their weights determining soil quality are obtained from the results of differential calculations describing the processes.
“Factors and their weights determining soil quality are obtained from the results of differential calculations describing the processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIf an average behaviour can be described by a well-defined stochastic process, then the output of the model is a parameter that describes the whole process with a feasible value.
“If an “average” behaviour can be described by a well-defined stochastic process, then the output of the model is a parameter that describes the whole process with a feasible value (Bouma and van Lanen, 1987).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bouma and van Lanen, 1987
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThreshold models use the extreme values of diagnostic properties to determine output values.
“Threshold models use the extreme values of diagnostic properties to determine output values (Johnson et al., 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Johnson et al., 1994 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenMarginal lands can be used as an important starting point for assessing geographically explicit suitability for crop production.
“Marginal lands can be used as an important starting point for assessing geographically explicit suitability for crop production.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccording to Schroers (2006), marginal land is an area where cost effective production is not possible because of factors like soil quality or land use policies.
“According to Schroers (2006) marginal land is an area where cost effective production is not possible because of factors like soil quality or land use policies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schroers (2006)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenLand is economically marginal if the combination of yields and prices barely cover the cost of production.
“Land is economically marginal if the combination of yields and prices barely cover the cost of production.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccording to Dale et al. (2010), marginal land is a relative term which can vary by countries, organization and land use purpose.
“According to Dale et al. (2010) marginal land is a relative term which can vary by countries, organization and land use purpose.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dale et al. (2010)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSuch lands have the potential to produce biomass without displacing traditional crops.
“Such lands have the potential to produce biomass without displacing traditional crops.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites James (2010)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationQuantitative, qualitative and hybrid land evaluation systems can be static or dynamic.
“Quantitative, qualitative and hybrid land evaluation systems can be static or dynamic (Van Lanen et al., 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Lanen et al., 1992 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Klingebiel and Montgomery's classification, soils in classes 5 to 7 are only suitable for cultivation of adapted indigenous plant species, while class 8 is not suitable for agricultural production.
“Soils in classes 5 to 7 are only suitable for the cultivation of adapted indigenous plant species, while the lowest class, class 8, is not suitable for agricultural production.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klingebiel and Montgomery (1961)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the EU Joint Research Centre criteria, slope of the land is bigger than 15%.
“Slope of the land is bigger than 15%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKarmanov and Friyev (1985) use the Soil Ecological Index (SEI) to express the soil productivity potential.
“Karmanov and Friyev (1985) use the so-called Soil Ecological Index (SEI) to express the soil productivity potential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Karmanov and Friyev (1985)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn China the use of prime land to produce bioenergy is not allowed, therefore wasteland and paddy lands (natural grassland, sparse forestland, scrubland and unused land), described as marginal lands, are used to grow energy crops.
“In China the use of prime land to produce bioenergy is not allowed, therefore wasteland and paddy lands (natural grassland, sparse forestland, scrubland and unused land), which are described as marginal lands are used to grow energy crops (Zhang et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataToday's researchers are mostly interested in the production of biomass on marginal land, but there is also a strong focus on management and the special characteristics of these lands.
“Based on these terms we can state that todays researchers mostly interested in the production of biomass on marginal land, but there is also a strong focus on management and the special characteristics of these lands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLand can be marginal if land use includes idle and fallow cropland or conservation reserve program land.
“Land can be marginal if land use includes idle and fallow cropland or conservation reserve program land.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gopalakrishnan et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMarginal lands are the reverse of prime farmland, and are limited by inherent soil characteristics.
“Marginal lands are the reverse of prime farmland, and are limited by inherent soil characteristics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites USDA-NRCS, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKlingebiel and Montgomery (1961) determined four types of limitations and hazards as subclasses: erosion hazard, wetness, rooting zone limitation and climate.
“As subclasses they determinate four type of limitations and hazards: erosion hazard, wetness, rooting zone limitation and climate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klingebiel and Montgomery (1961)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTógyer (2012) shows the Hungarian Agricultural Research Institute's yield-base method, which is an economic point of view calculation.
“Tógyer (2012) shows the Hungarian Agricultural Research Institute's yield-base method, which is an economic point of view calculation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tógyer (2012)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe EU Common Agricultural Policy for 2014-2020 required the identification of areas facing natural constraints, called Less Favoured Areas, which can be interpreted as marginal land.
“The EU Common Agricultural Policy for the period 2014-2020 required the identification of areas which facing natural constraints.These areas called Less Favoured Areas and it can be interpreted as marginal land (Confalonieri et al., 2014;Jones et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Confalonieri et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jones et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenIn general, studies on marginal land are based on the economic and environmental characteristics of the land.
“In general, these studies are based on the economic and environmental characteristics of the land.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMarginal lands are areas that are not only low in production but also have constraints that make them unsuitable for agricultural practices.
“Marginal lands are areas that are not only low in production but also have constraints that make them unsuitable for agricultural practices (Hart, 2001;Jones et al., 2014;Schubert et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hart, 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jones et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schubert et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe inadequate use of marginal land can have many negative consequences, such as wind erosion, nitrate enrichment in groundwater, loss of biodiversity, soil structure degradation.
“The inadequate use of marginal land can have many negative consequences, such as wind erosion, nitrate enrichment in groundwater, loss of biodiversity (flora, fauna), soil structure degradation, etc. (Bertzky et al., 2011;Bindraban et al., 2009;Csikos et al., 2019;Duttmann et al., 2014;Immerzeel et al., 2014;Plieninger and Gaertner, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAnother criteria set from the Joint Research Centre contains sub-severe thresholds proposed by the expert.
“Another criteria set from the Joint Research Centre contains sub-severe thresholds proposed by the expert (Confalonieri et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Confalonieri et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationOne advantage of Klingebiel and Montgomery's classification is the ability to classify land according to its management functions and potential, which can be used to decide on final land use in the context of available agrotechnology/technology.
“One of the advantages of the above classification, in addition to assessing the suitability of the land for crop production, is the ability to classify the land according to its management functions and potential, which can be used to decide on the final use of the land in the context of the available agrotechnology/technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klingebiel and Montgomery (1961)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the FAO (1993) framework, marginally suitable groups are based on growing period <210 days, evapotranspiration >0.55, poor soil drainage, water table depth <50 cm, pH <4 or >8, CEC 0-20 cm <6 meq%, base saturation <20%, and EC of saturation extract >9.
“Marginally suitable groups are based on the followings: growing period <210 days, Evapotranspiration >0.55 1-ETa/ETm, soil drainage poor, water table depth < 50 cm, pH < 4 or > 8, CEC 0-20 cm < 6 meq%, base saturation < 20%, EC of saturation extract >9.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites FAO (1993)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe SEI methodology was adopted by Sisov et al. (1991) with indices corrected according to crop requirements, with different rates for different soil types and climatic conditions, to calculate the productivity value.
“The methodology was adopted by Sisov et al. (1991) with the indices corrected according to crop requirements, with different rates for different soil types and climatic conditions, to calculate the productivity value.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sisov et al. (1991)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMilbrandt and Overend (2008) in the APEC Energy Working Group declared marginal lands based on biophysical parameters including bare or herbaceous areas, moderate (8-16%) and steep slope (16-30%), shallow soil (<50 cm), poorly drained soils, low or moderate natural fertility, coarse or sandy soil, soils with heavy cracking clays, salt-affected soils, soils with gypsic horizon, acid soils (pH <5.5,
“Milbrandt and Overend (2008) in the Energy Working Group of APEC declared marginal lands based on biophysical parameters including bare or herbaceous areas, moderate (8-16%) and steep slope (16-30%), shallow soil (<50 cm), poorly drained soils, low or moderate natural fertility, coarse or sandy soil, soils with heavy cracking clays (vertisols and vertic sub-groups), salt-affected soils (Solonchaks”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Milbrandt and Overend (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKlingebiel and Montgomery (1961) established eight further classes, and from class I to class VIII the risk of soil limitation became greater.
“They established eight further classes and class I to class VIII the risk of soil limitation became greater.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klingebiel and Montgomery (1961)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe EU Joint Research Centre criteria include growing period days ≤180, thermal time ≤1500°-days, dryness P/PET ≤0.5, soil moisture excess days more than 230, wet within 80 cm (6 months) or 40 cm (11 months), coarse material ≥15% or half or more in 100 cm is sand or loamy sand or heavy clay (≥60%) or organic soil in 40 cm or top soil contains ≥30% clay, rooting depth ≤30 cm, salinity ≥4 dS/m or s
“Criteria are the followings: growing period days ≤180, thermal time ≤ 1500 • -days, dryness P/PET ≤0.5, soil moisture excess days more then 230, wet within 80 cm (6 moths) or 40 cm (11 months), coarse material ≥15% or half or more in 100 cm is sand or loamy sand or heavy clay (≥60%) or organic soil in 40 cm or top soil contains ≥30% clay, rooting depth ≤ 30 cm, salinity ≥4 dS/m or sodicity ≥6 ESP”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCai et al. (2011) published a paper on world-wide land availability for biofuel production based on low resolution global datasets.
“Cai et al. (2011) published a paper on world-wide land availability for biofuel production based on low resolution global datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cai et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationYang et al. (2020) did country scale (USA) analysis to delineate marginal land for bioenergy crop production based on remote sensed data.
“Yang et al. (2020) did country scale (USA) analysis to delineate marginal land for bioenergy crop production based on remote sensed data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yang et al. (2020) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWBGU defines marginal lands as areas with low agricultural or forestry productivity, such as arid and semi-arid grasslands, desert fringes, and areas with steep ground and structurally weak or erosion prone soils, especially in mountainous regions.
“Wissenschaftlichen Beirats der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (WBGU) (Schubert et al., 2008) defines marginal lands as areas with low agricultural or forestry productivity, such as arid and semi-arid grasslands, desert fringes, and areas with steep ground and structurally weak or erosion prone soils, especially in mountainous regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schubert et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSustainable management of ecosystem services may help to mitigate soil degradation while also increasing the production of services for both private landowners and society.
“Sustainable management of ecosystem services may help to mitigate soil degradation while also increasing the production of services for both private landowners and society (Breure et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Breure et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKlingebiel and Montgomery (1961) grouped agricultural lands into categories and classes based on their biophysical attributes and characteristics.
“Klingebiel and Montgomery (1961) grouped agricultural lands into categories and classes based on their biophysical attributes and characteristics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klingebiel and Montgomery (1961)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBased on biophysical attributes, marginal land in Nebraska is eroded, frequently flooded (>50%), poorly drained (classes 6 and 7), highly sloped (>15°), and low productivity for the main grain crop (nonirrigated corn yields <9 tonnes/ha).
“Based on the biophysical attributes of the land the marginal land is eroded, frequently flooded (> 50%), poorly drained (classes 6 and 7), highly sloped (> 15 • ) and low productivity for the main grain crop (nonirrigated yields of corn <9 tones/ha).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gopalakrishnan et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMarginal lands can be characterised with insufficient rainfall, extreme temperatures, poor soil quality, steep terrain, or other agricultural limitation issues.
“Such areas can also be characterised with insufficient rainfall, extreme temperatures, poor soil quality, steep terrain, or other agricultural limitation issues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Milbrandt and Overend, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Klingebiel and Montgomery's classification, classes 1 to 4 indicate soils suitable for cultivation of domesticated crops.
“Classes 1 to 4 are also classified according to the crops, and indicate soils that are suitable for the cultivation of domesticated crops.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klingebiel and Montgomery (1961)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccording to APEC, marginal lands have a harsh climate, poor physical characteristics, and are difficult to cultivate.
“According to the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Energy Working group (APECE-WG, Milbrandt and Overend, 2008), the marginal lands have a harsh climate, poor physical characteristics, and are difficult to cultivate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Milbrandt and Overend, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMarginal land also covers formerly productive areas that have lost their yield potential due to human-induced soil degradation, or have been intentionally taken out of production.
“Alternatively, marginal land also covers formerly productive areas that have lost their yield potential due to human-induced soil degradation (e.g., overused, degraded, and thus unproductive land, including both forests, pasture and arable land), or have been intentionally taken out of production.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schubert et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenLand is being abandoned in Europe, resulting in rural disintegration, as well as the loss of traditional farming methods, farm livelihoods, and tourism.
“Land is being abandoned in Europe, resulting in rural disintegration, as well as the loss of traditional farming methods, farm livelihoods, and tourism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenApproaches to identify and classify marginal lands are manyfold and largely depend on the spatial scale of the assessment and the regional conditions for which the assessment is carried out.
“Approaches to identify and classify marginal lands are manyfold, largely depending on the spatial scale of the assessment and the regional conditions for which the assessment is carried on.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOne disadvantageous feature of the soil may make it unusable, necessitating extensive, ameliorating treatment.
“One disadvantageous feature of the soil may make it unusable, necessitating extensive, ameliorating treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGrassland that cannot be used as arable land should be used for grazing, which is the most effective practice on this land use type.
“As in traditional land use systems, grassland that cannot be used as arable land should use for grazing which is the most effective practice on this land use type (Petersen and Snapp, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Petersen and Snapp, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenAn area to be classified may be suitable for one utilisation while unsuitable for another.
“As an area to be classified may be suitable for one utilisation while unsuitable for another, the identification of marginal areas shall be purpose specific.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe list of incentives to bring marginal lands to cultivation for bioenergy include income support, and tradable carbon certificates based on environmental assessment.
“The list of incentives to bring marginal lands to cultivation for bioenergy include income support, and tradable carbon certificates based on environmental assessment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningConcepts of marginal land and methods of identification usually follow two distinct approaches for agricultural lands: one based on economic indicators and the other on biophysical conditions.
“Taking all the above considerations into account, concepts of marginal land and methods of identifications usually follow two distinct approaches for agricultural lands.One approach is based on economic indicators, the other is on biophysical conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKlingebiel and Montgomery (1961) collected 8 indicators to put soils into capability classes.
“Klingebiel and Montgomery (1961) collected 8 indicators to put soils into capability classes (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klingebiel and Montgomery (1961)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenMarginalisation is sometimes irreversible.
“Furthermore, marginalisation is a process in time, which is sometime irreversible, while in other cases with the amelioration a previously marginal land can be turned suitable for the objective of the use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBioenergy related feedstocks (e.g. corn stover, switchgrass) could be valuable supply for farms to feed livestock, so bioenergy has a double effect in rural development in marginal lands.
“Bioenergy related feedstocks (e.g. corn stover, switchgrass) could be valuable supply for farms to feed livestock, so the bioenergy has a double effect in rural development in marginal lands (Helliwell, 2018;Mooney et al., 2015;Muscat et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenIn some cases, with amelioration, previously marginal land can be turned suitable for the objective of the use.
“Furthermore, marginalisation is a process in time, which is sometime irreversible, while in other cases with the amelioration a previously marginal land can be turned suitable for the objective of the use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenAny unfavourable recurring or permanent soil or landscape feature may limit the land's safe and productive use.
“Any unfavourable recurring or permanent soil or landscape features may limit the land's safe and productive use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccording to the review of Muscat et al. (2022), main policies and related projects targeting marginal lands in the European Union can be framed to three major areas: sustainable bioenergy, rural development and ecosystem restoration.
“According to the review of Muscat et al. (2022) main policies and related projects targeting marginal lands in the European Union can be framed to three major areas: sustainable bioenergy, rural development and ecosystem restoration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Muscat et al. (2022) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMarginal lands which are almost unproductive or highly degraded can be turned into productive land again.
“Marginal lands which are almost unproductive or highly degraded can be turn into productive land again.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe MAGIC project collected and rated the yield ratio of 37 industrial crops under different soil conditions, creating a rich database for choosing crop type according to the marginal land type.
“The MAGIC (Marginal Lands for Growing Industrial Crops) project (MAGIC, 2022) had collected and rated the yield ratio of 37 industrial crop under different soil conditions, creating a rich database for choosing crop type according to the marginal land type.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites MAGIC, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn mountainous areas, a micro irrigation canal system was established for supplying water to poplar plantations on sloping lands and non-fruit and fruit trees are planted on heavily degraded forest land to protect the land from erosion and further degradation and provide fuelwood for the local community.
“In mountainous areas micro irrigation canal system was established for supplying water to poplar plantations on sloping lands and non-fruit and fruit trees are planted on heavily degraded forest land to protect the land from erosion and further degradation and provide fuelwood for the local community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites WOCAT
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe area is put under quarantine for three years to allow for the pasture to restore sufficiently.
“The area is put under quarantine for three years to allow for the pasture to restore sufficiently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites WOCAT
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMarginal land is seen as a way to preserve traditional farming methods and rural landscapes.
“On the other hand, marginal land is seen as a way to preserve traditional farming methods and rural landscapes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSeveral minor undesirable characteristics combined may become a major issue, limiting the use of the soil.
“Several minor undesirable characteristics combined may become a major issue, limiting the use of the soil.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenA main element of the utilisation of marginal areas is livestock breeding, which may have significant environmental impact.
“A main element of the utilisation of marginal areas is livestock breeding, which may have significant environmental impact.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenPrinciples of sustainable land management, including profitability and land conservation, apply also to marginal lands which are between prime lands and unproductive lands.
“Principles of sustainable land management, including profitability and land conservation apply also to marginal lands which are between the prime lands (best for food production) and unproductive lands (unsuitable for agricultural production).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMarginal areas generally have low productivity and thus low profitability.
“Because of generally low productivity and thus profitability is expected on marginal areas”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCamelina has a wide range of environmental adaptability, low input requirements, pest and disease resistance, and multiple applications in food, feed, and biobased products, and improves biodiversity and soil characteristics.
“It has a wide range of environmental adaptability, low input requirements, pest and disease resistance, and multiple applications in food, feed, and biobased products and improve the biodiversity and soil characteristic (Zanetti et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zanetti et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis approach has the potential to strengthen the growing bio-based industry, reduce competition in land use, increase farmer incomes, and increase the value of marginal land.
“This approach has the potential to strengthen the growing bio-based industry, reduce competition in land use, increase farmer incomes, and increase the value of marginal land (Elbersen et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Elbersen et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn another WOCAT project, degraded pastures are restored with alfalfa through broad seeding method.
“In another project degraded pastures are restored with alfalfa through broad seeding method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites WOCAT
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenPerceptions of marginal land are dynamic both in time and space.
“As perceptions of marginal land are dynamic both in time and space, flexible policy and practical solutions are needed for their non-degrading use, which in any case shall support nature-based socioeconomic development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThey also cultivated the slopes with Ferula to protect cropland and grazing land from erosion.
“They also cultivated the slopes with Ferula to protect cropland and grazing land from erosion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites WOCAT
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenLands concerned for bioenergy purposes are usually abandoned land, degraded land, contaminated land, land with economic and biophysical constraints.
“Lands concerned for bioenergy purposes are usually abandoned land, degraded land, contaminated land, land with economic and biophysical constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMarginality is not a permanent state of the land, just a state in between prime land and unproductive land.
“Marginality is not a permanent state of the land, just a state in between prime land and unproductive land (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEsch et al. (2021) have done a complex delineation of economically marginal land in Canada, taking into account several types of factors including historical and present economic and population data using a SWOT analysis.
“Esch et al. (2021) have done a complex delineation of economically marginal land in Canada, and took into account several types of factors including historical and present economic and population data using a SWOT analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Esch et al. (2021)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenMarginalisation is a process in time.
“Furthermore, marginalisation is a process in time, which is sometime irreversible, while in other cases with the amelioration a previously marginal land can be turned suitable for the objective of the use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Bangladesh, strip tillage wheat cultivation is a climate-smart technology to save water and improve soil health.
“In Bangladesh the strip tillage wheat cultivation is a climate-smart technology to save water and improve soil health.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites WOCAT
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIndustrial crops can be used to produce high-value-added products and bioenergy.
“Industrial crops can be used to produce high-value-added products and bioenergy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWOCAT introduces several projects in Afghanistan, for example a plan for rotational grazing, which has been developed to control pasture use and prevent overgrazing of rehabilitated pastures.
“WOCAT also introduces several projects in Afghanistan, for example a plan for rotational grazing, which has been developed to control pasture use and prevent overgrazing of rehabilitated pastures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites WOCAT
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere are big differences between crops; switchgrass (as other perennial crops) can stabilize carbon dynamics and increase humification, unlike silage maize, which leads to opposite processes.
“There are big differences between the crops, e.g. the switchgrass (as other perennial crops), which can stabilized the carbon dynamics and increase the humification, unlike silage maize, which leads to the opposite processes (Zhu et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhu et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMAGIC project researchers found that Camelina could be a good alternative crop of many marginal lands in Europe.
“For example, MAGIC project researchers found that Camelina could be a good alternative crop of many marginal lands in Europe.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zanetti et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThese indicators represent biophysical properties which can negatively affect lands and make them marginal lands.
“These indicators represent biophysical properties which can negatively affect lands and make them marginal lands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationNon-appropriate procedures before bioenergy plantation can lead to negative consequences like increased soil erosion and compaction risks, increased nitrogen mineralization and leaching risks, and changes in local biodiversity.
“non-appropriate procedures can lead to many negative consequences like increased soil erosion and compaction risks (Duttmann et al., 2014), increased nitrogen mineralization and leaching risks (Claus et al., 2014;Svoboda et al., 2013), and changes in local bio-diversity (Brandt and Glemnitz, 2014;Csikós and Szilassi, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Thailand, the use of bio-fermentation for the production of organic soil amendments is a successful practice that helps to restore land degraded by intensive use and restore the fertility level.
“For example, in Thailand the use of bio-fermentation for the production of organic soil amendments as an alternative technology is a successful practice that helps to restore land degraded by intensive use and restore the fertility level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites WOCAT
Not checked in the free run.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Marginal areas are typically characterized by low agricultural productivity.
“Those areas are typically characterized to be low agricultural productive”
From Assessing the future prospects of emerging technologies for shipping and aviation biofuels: A critical review (2024) · cites this paper as [65]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Ten terms are identified as the first five
MinorThe sentence says it names the first five terms but lists ten.
“The first five terms are biomass, crops, species, breeding, mals, traits, yield, production, genetic and quality.”
“biomass, crops, species, breeding, mals, traits, yield, production, genetic and quality”
Figure 4 has conflicting descriptions of its source
MinorThe text says the word cloud uses the first 100 articles from Google Scholar, while the figure caption says it uses websites from Google search results.
“Fig. 4. shows the most frequently used terms in the 'marginal land' topic in the first 100 articles from the Google Scholar database (http://worldcloudit.com).”
“Fig. 4. Word cloud of 'marginal land' based on websites of google search results.”
Cites
Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1116437108 · Cited by 7,692 · see citing works
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Hawthorne, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152747 · Cited by 3,902 · see citing works
World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revisionPreprint
Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.288998 · Cited by 3,155 · see citing works
Soil quality – A critical review
Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V., Kuyper, T. W., Mäder, P., et al. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030 · Cited by 2,960 · see citing works
Soil Quality: A Concept, Definition, and Framework for Evaluation (A Guest Editorial)
Karlen, D. L., Mausbach, M. J., Doran, J. W., Cline, R. G., Harris, R. F., & Schuman, G. E. (1997) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100010001x · Cited by 2,028 · see citing works
A framework for land evaluation
van den Brink, R., & Young, A. (1977) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 1,318 · see citing works
Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation
Kurz, H. D., & Salvadori, N. (2015) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781784715489.0059 · Cited by 1,177 · see citing works
Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate
Mottet, A., de Haan, C., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., Opio, C., & Gerber, P. (2017) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.001 · Cited by 1,034 · see citing works
Using Soil Survey Data for Quantitative Land Evaluation
Bouma, J. (1989) · Advances in soil science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3532-3_4 · Cited by 834 · see citing works
Abandonment of agricultural land: an overview of drivers and consequences.
Beñayas, J. M. R., Martins, A. G. S., Ibarra, J. M. N., & Schulz, J. J. (2007) · CABI Reviews · doi:10.1079/pavsnnr20072057 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers
Garnett, T. (2009) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.006 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Soil Compaction and Root Growth: A Review
Unger, P. W., & Kaspar, T. C. (1994) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600050004x · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation
BURROUGH, P. A. (1989) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1989.tb01290.x · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Marginal lands in Europe—causes of decline
Strijker, D. (2005) · Basic and Applied Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2005.01.001 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Land Availability for Biofuel Production
Cai, X., Zhang, X., & Wang, D. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es103338e · Cited by 444 · see citing works
A theoretical framework for land evaluation
Rossiter, D. G. (1996) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/0016-7061(96)00031-6 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: Agroecosystems
Wood, S., Sebastian, K., & Scherr, S. J. (2000) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 350 · see citing works
What is sustainable intensification? Views from experts
Petersen, B., & Snapp, S. S. (2015) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.002 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy crop production: a state‐of‐the‐art review
Immerzeel, D. J., Verweij, P. A., van der Hilst, F., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12067 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Domingues, R. R., Sanchez-Monedero, M. A., Spokas, K. A., Melo, L. C. A., Trugilho, P. F., Valenciano, M. N., & Silva, C. A. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10060824 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Guidelines :land evaluation for rainfed agriculture
Services, C. (2016) · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Soil-Erosion and Runoff Prevention by Plant Covers: A Review
Zuazo, V. H. D., & Pleguezuelo, C. R. R. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_48 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
The fertility capability soil classification system: interpretation, applicability and modification
Sanchez, P. A., Couto, W., & Buol, S. W. (1982) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/0016-7061(82)90019-2 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Emerging land use practices rapidly increase soil organic matter
Machmuller, M. B., Kramer, M. G., Cyle, T. K., Hill, N., Hancock, D., & Thompson, A. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7995 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Bioenergy from “surplus” land: environmental and socio-economic implications
Dauber, J., Brown, C., Fernando, A. L., Finnan, J., Krasuska, E., Ponitka, J., Styles, D., Thrän, D., Van Groenigen, K. J., Weih, M., et al. (2012) · BioRisk · doi:10.3897/biorisk.7.3036 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Van Kernebeek, H. R. J., Oosting, S. J., Van Ittersum, M. K., Bikker, P., & De Boer, I. J. M. (2016) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0923-6 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
“Marginal land” for energy crops: Exploring definitions and embedded assumptions
Shortall, O. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.048 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Marginal Lands: Concept, Assessment and Management
Kang, S. K., Post, W. M., Nichols, J. A., Wang, D., West, T. O., Bandaru, V., & Izaurralde, R. C. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.5539/jas.v5n5p129 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Land use change in an agricultural landscape causing degradation of soil based ecosystem services
Baude, M., Meyer, B. C., & Schindewolf, M. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.455 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
A novel framework to classify marginal land for sustainable biomass feedstock production
Gopalakrishnan, G., Cristina Negri, M., & Snyder, S. W. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2010.0539 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Future Bioenergy and Sustainable Land Use
Schubert, R. (2009) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781849774505 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Camelina, an ancient oilseed crop actively contributing to the rural renaissance in Europe. A review
Zanetti, F., Alberghini, B., Jeromela, A. M., Grahovac, N., Rajković, D., Kiprovski, B., & Monti, A. (2021) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-020-00663-y · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Tillage and agricultural sustainability
Lal, R. (1991) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/0167-1987(91)90036-w · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Marginal land‐based biomass energy production in China
Tang, Y., Xie, J., & Geng, S. (2010) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00903.x · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Goldberg, S. (1989) · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis · doi:10.1080/00103629009368144 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Guerra, C. A., Maes, J., Geijzendorffer, I. R., & Metzger, M. J. (2015) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.043 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Ruskule, A., Nikodemus, O., Kasparinskis, R., et al. (2013) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.03.012 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Liu, S. L., Dong, Y., Li, D., et al. (2012) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.001 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Improvement in Water-Holding Capacity and Structural Stability of a Sandy Soil in Northeast Thailand
Suzuki, S., Noble, A., Ruaysoongnern, S., et al. (2006) · Arid Land Research and Management · doi:10.1080/15324980601087430 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Redefining marginal land for bioenergy crop production
Khanna, M., Chen, L., Basso, B., Cai, X., Field, J. L., Guan, K., Jiang, C., Lark, T. J., Richard, T. L., Spawn‐Lee, S. A., et al. (2021) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12877 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
new system of soil appraisal in terms of actual and potential productivity
Riquier, J., Bramao, D. L., & Cornet, J.-P. (1970) · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Ecosystem services: a useful concept for soil policy making!
Breure, A., De Deyn, G., Dominati, E., Eglin, T., Hedlund, K., Van Orshoven, J., & Posthuma, L. (2012) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.010 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Can large-scale biofuels production be sustainable by 2020?
Bindraban, P. S., Bulte, E. H., & Conijn, S. G. (2009) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2009.06.005 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Peterson, G. M., & Galbraith, J. K. (1932) · Journal of Farm Economics · doi:10.2307/1230112 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Abandoned agricultural land and its potential for short rotation woody crops in Latvia
Abolina, E., & Luzadis, V. A. (2015) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.022 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Harnessing degraded lands for biodiversity conservation
Plieninger, T., & Gaertner, M. (2010) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2010.04.001 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Techniques of crop yield assessment for agricultural land evaluation
Dumanski, J., & Onofrei, C. (1989) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.1989.tb00754.x · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Masud, M. M., Li, J.-Y., & Xu, R. (2014) · Pedosphere · doi:10.1016/s1002-0160(14)60066-7 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Predicting soil compaction risks related to field traffic during silage maize harvest
Duttmann, R., Schwanebeck, M., Nolde, M., & Horn, R. (2014) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2013.05.0198 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Crop production for biogas and water protection—A trade-off?
Svoboda, N., Taube, F., Kluß, C., Wienforth, B., Kage, H., Ohl, S., Hartung, E., & Herrmann, A. (2013) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.05.024 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
A mixed qualitative/quantitative physical land evaluation methodology
van Lanen, H. A. J., Hack-ten Broeke, M. J. D., Bouma, J., & de Groot, W. J. M. (1992) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/0016-7061(92)90004-q · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Half a century of cropland change
Hart, J. F. (2001) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/3594739 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Zhu, X., Liang, C., Masters, M. D., Kantola, I. B., & DeLucia, E. H. (2018) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12520 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Helliwell, R. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.011 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Yang, P., Zhao, Q., & Cai, X. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab865f · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Potential energy production from algae on marginal land in China
Zhang, Q., Ma, J., Qiu, G., Li, L., Geng, S., Hasi, E., Li, C., Wang, G., & Li, X. (2012) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.084 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Determinants of soil quality and health
Doran, J. W., Jones, A. J., Arshad, M. A., & Gilley, J. E. (2018) · Soil Quality and Soil Erosion · doi:10.1201/9780203739266-2 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The promised land: contrasting frames of marginal land in the European Union
Muscat, A., de Olde, E. M., Candel, J. J. L., de Boer, I. J. M., & Ripoll-Bosch, R. (2022) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105860 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Assessing the regional impacts of increased energy maize cultivation on farmland birds
Brandt, K., & Glemnitz, M. (2013) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-013-3407-9 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
CLAUS, S., TAUBE, F., WIENFORTH, B., SVOBODA, N., SIELING, K., KAGE, H., SENBAYRAM, M., DITTERT, K., GERICKE, D., PACHOLSKI, A., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859613000683 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Csikos, N., Schwanebeck, M., Kuhwald, M., Szilassi, P., & Duttmann, R. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11092500 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Mooney, D. F., Barham, B. L., & Lian, C. (2015) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/ppu033 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Ecosystem service analysis in marginal agricultural lands: A case study in Belize
Wells, G. J., Stuart, N., Furley, P. A., & Ryan, C. M. (2018) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.06.002 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Confalonieri, R., Jones, R. L., van Diepen, K., & Orshoven, J. V. (2014) · Lirias (KU Leuven) · doi:10.2788/844501 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Theory and Identification of Marginal Land and Factors Determining Land Use ChangePreprint
James, L. K., & James, L. (2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.98203 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Hollander, J. H. (1895) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1885598 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Csikós, N., & Szilassi, P. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12020664 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationJones, R. L., Bas, C. L., Nachtergaele, F., Rossiter, D., Orshoven, J. V., Schulte, R. P. O., & van Velthuizen, H. (2014) · Lirias (KU Leuven) · doi:10.2788/79958 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
First application of automated land evaluation in iran
Makhdoum, M. (1993) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/bf02394683 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
D2.1. Definition and classification of marginal lands suitable for industrial crops in Europe
Elbersen, B. S., van Eupen, E., Mantel, S., et al. (2017) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3539228 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Hamilton, G., Sheppard, J. S., Bowey, R., & Fisher, P. D. (2016) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr15364 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Rising farm costs, marginal land cropping, and ecosystem service marketsPreprint
Esch, E. H., McCann, K., Kamm, C., Arce, B., Carroll, O., Dolezal, A. J., Mazzorato, A. C. M., Noble, D. H., Fraser, E., Fryxell, J. M., et al. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-223049/v1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
GIS—Based Red Soil Resources Classification and Evaluation
Huyueming, & WANGRen-Chao (1999) · Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The use of crop yield prediction as a tool for land evaluation studies in northern Australia
Johnson, A. K. L., Cramb, R. A., & Wegener, M. K. (1994) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/0308-521x(94)90171-b · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Esch, E. H., & MacDougall, A. S. (2018) · AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Impact of land quality on land productivity trends in Hungary
Tóth, G., Ivits, E., Laborczi, A., et al. (2021) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-7930 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationCharacteristics of Arable Land Valuation in Hungary
Tógyer, T. N. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- FAO, 1985, Guidelines: land evaluation for irrigated agriculture, FAO Soils Bull., 55
- FAO, 1993, FESLM: an international framework for evaluating sustainable land management, World Resour. Rep., 73
- Fórizsné, 1972, Talajbonitáció - Földértékelés, MTA Agrártudományok Osztályának Közleményei, 30, 359
- Goldberg, 2008, 20, 1181
- Karmanov, 1985, Site quality based on ecological soil indices, Soil Surv. L. Eval., 5, 40
- Koreleski, 1988, Adaptations of the Storie index for land evaluation in Poland, Soil Surv. L. Eval., 8, 23
- Kumar, 1984, Soil evaluation for agricultural land Us_II. Productivity potential appraisal, J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 32, 467
- Máté, 1960, Megjegyzések a talajok termékenységük szerinti osztályozásához, Agrokém. Talajt., 9, 419
- Shao, 1984, Land evaluation in China, Soil Surv. L. Eval., 4, 39
- Sigmond, 1935, A birtokpolitikai tervek és a talaj belső értékének meghatározása, Köztelek, 44, 1003
- Suzuki, 2007, 21, 37
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Arias, A., Nika, C.-E., Vasilaki, V., Feijoo, G., Moreira, M. T., & Katsou, E. (2024) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114427 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Chen, M., Chen, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174462 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Carbon negative biofuels: a step ahead of carbon neutrality
Sharma, T., Chauhan, P. S., Patel, M., Singh, A., Kaur, M., Chauhan, G., Rana, B. B., Kumar, N., & Walia, A. (2025) · Biofuels · doi:10.1080/17597269.2025.2450156 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Csikós, N., & Tóth, G.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Soil Sciences (HU)
- Corresponding author
- Csikós, Nándor
- Venue
- Agricultural Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 204
- Pages
- 103560
- ISSN
- 0308-521X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4309580636
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 12
- FWCI
- 21.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (818346)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- land classification, land degradation, land reclamation, sustainable land management, energy crops, high nature value farming, afforestation, ecosystem services, food security, land policy, soil suitability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review