Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcome

Kurki, T, Sivonen, A, Renkonen, O‐V, Savia, E, Ylikorkala, O·1993·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the association between bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcome. METHODS: Vaginal swabs for bacterial culture, Gram stain, and Papanicolaou stain were taken at the first prenatal visit between 8-17 weeks' gestation in 790 healthy nulliparous women. RESULTS: Culture-proven bacterial vaginosis was detected in 169 of 790 women (21.4%), 167 (98.8%) of whom could also be identified by Gram stain. Papanicolaou smears were available from 299 women, among whom 101 had bacterial vaginosis on culture; of these 101, 78 (77.2%) could be detected by Papanicolaou stain. Of the 751 women whose clinical follow-up was completed, 42 had been treated for preterm uterine contractions (preterm labor), but only 17 delivered between 20-36 weeks' gestation (preterm birth). Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) occurred more than 6 hours before delivery in 80 cases (nine preterm and 71 term). Bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy predicted preterm labor, preterm birth, or preterm PROM with a sensitivity of 41-67%, specificity of 79%, and negative predictive value of 96-99%, but the positive predictive value was low at 4-11%. However, bacterial vaginosis was associated with a 2.6-fold risk (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-4.9) for preterm labor, a 6.9-fold risk (95% CI 2.5-18.8) for preterm birth, and a 7.3-fold risk (95% CI 1.8-29.4) for preterm PROM. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy can be detected reliably by Gram stain and, in most cases, by Papanicolaou smear. Although bacterial vaginosis is associated with preterm labor, preterm birth, and preterm PROM, the clinical usefulness of its assessment is limited because of the high rate of false-positive findings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0020-7292(93)90172-s

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Kurki, T., Sivonen, A., Renkonen, O., Savia, E., & Ylikorkala, O.
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-04
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
110-110
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W2069251121
Cited by
303
References
0
FWCI
12.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0020-7292(93)90172-s
The paper
Kurki, T., Sivonen, A., Renkonen, O., Savia, E., & Ylikorkala, O. (1993). Bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(93)90172-s

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.