Cited by 31Helminth infection and controlVeterinary medicine and infectious diseasesParasites and Host Interactions

In vitro characterization of anthelmintic susceptibility of field isolates of the pig nodular worm Oesophagostomum spp., susceptible or resistant to various anthelmintics

Várady, Marián, Bjørn, Henrik, Nansen, Peter·1996·International Journal for Parasitology

Abstract

A larval development assay (LDA) and an egg hatch paralysis assay (EHPA) were used to measure the sensitivity to anthelmintics of eggs and larvae of nodular worms (Oesophagostomum spp.) in pigs. The tests were carried out using in vivo defined resistant and susceptible isolates of Oesophagostomum dentatum, O. quadrispinulatum and Oesophagostomum spp. For measurement of pyrantel/morantel and levamisole sensitivity the LDA was found able to distinguish between susceptible or resistant isolates of Oesophagostomum. The EHPA was able to detect levamisole resistance, but the test failed to show differences in response to pyrantel between pyrantel susceptible and resistant lines. The possible routine application of LDA and EHPA in the diagnosis of anthelmintic resistance in Oesophagostomum spp. is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0020-7519(96)00051-3

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The EHA has been used successfully to detect resistance against benzimidazoles in multiple nematode parasites of livestock.

    “Based on the ovicidal properties of the benzimidazole drug class [54], this assay has been used successfully to detect resistance against benzimidazoles in multiple nematode parasites of livestock [55–57].”
  • In vitro bioassays used for detection of anthelmintic resistance in parasitic nematodes are highly species-specific and drug class-specific in their ability to provide useful levels of discrimination between susceptible and resistant isolates.

    “This finding builds on previous works demonstrating that in vitro bioassays used for detection of anthelmintic resistance in parasitic nematodes are highly species-specific and drug class-specific in their ability to provide useful levels of discrimination between susceptible and resistant isolates [43, 57, 63].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Várady, M., Bjørn, H., & Nansen, P.
Affiliations
Institute of Parasitology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
Corresponding author
Nansen, Peter
Venue
International Journal for Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-07
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
733-740
ISSN
0020-7519 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043985202
Cited by
31
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal for Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
Keywords
Oesophagostomum, anthelmintic resistance, Oesophagostomum dentatum, pyrantel, morantel, levamisole, larval development assay, drug susceptibility testing, field isolates
MeSH terms
Animals, Antinematodal Agents, Drug Resistance, Ivermectin, Larva, Levamisole, Morantel, Oesophagostomum, Ovum, Pyrantel, Swine, Thiabendazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review