The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elastic contact versus indentation modeling of multi-layered materials
Open accessAbstract
The elastic contact problem of a rigid cylindrical punch indenting a multi-layered linear elastic half space is studied and then used to model the unloading phase of a microindentation test of thin fims deposited on a substrate. First, we adopt a moduli-perturbation method to construct a closed-form, first-order-accurate solution for the contact compliance of a nonhomogeneous medium with a piecewise constant (layered) or continuously varying moduli in the depthwise direction. These solutions are used to estimate the unloading compliance associated with the indentation testing of an Aluminum thin film deposited on a Silicon substrate. Comparison with results obtained from numerical computations indicates that the perturbation estimates are approximately valid for a moderate range of material combinations of practical importance. Also, a finite element analysis is performed to investigate the effects of a penny-shaped debonding crack along the film; substrate interface on the unloading compliance, and to analyse the energy release rate which drives the interface crack. Important conclusions include: (i) interface debonding can cause a significant increase in the unloading compliance of an indentation test; (ii) there exists a saturation crack size beyond which the compliance no longer changes significantly with the crack length; (iii) the plastic deformation near the indentcr does not appreciably affect the unloading compliance, but it plays a major role in maintaining the long range energy release rate which drives the crack growth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zienkiewicz, O. C. (1989) · Cited by 14,802
Timoshenko, S. P., & Goodier, J. N. (1934) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 13,717
Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics
(1965) · Nature · doi:10.1038/206226b0 · Cited by 3,472
A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments
Doerner, M. F., & Nix, W. D. (1986) · Journal of Materials Research · doi:10.1557/jmr.1986.0601 · Cited by 2,863
Elastic analysis of some punch problems for a layered medium
King, R. B. (1987) · International Journal of Solids and Structures · doi:10.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-8 · Cited by 898
Vickers Indentation Curves of Magnesium Oxide (MgO)
Loubet, J. L., Georges, J. M., Marchesini, O., & Meille, G. (1984) · Journal of Tribology · doi:10.1115/1.3260865 · Cited by 421
Cited by
In vivo measurements of the elastic mechanical properties of human skin by indentation tests
Pailler-Mattei, C., Bec, S., & Zahouani, H. (2008) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.06.011 · Cited by 724
Nanoindentation in polymer nanocomposites
Díez-Pascual, A. M., Gómez-Fatou, M. A., Ania, F., & Flores, A. (2015) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.06.002 · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- Huajian, G., Cheng-Hsin, C., & Jin, L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Solids and Structures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2471-2492
- ISSN
- 0020-7683 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021781694
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elastic contact versus indentation modeling of multi-layered materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0020-7683(92)90004-d
- The paper
- Huajian, G., Cheng-Hsin, C., & Jin, L. (1992). Elastic contact versus indentation modeling of multi-layered materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(92)90004-d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.