Cited by 724Elasticity and Material ModelingUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyCellular Mechanics and Interactions

In vivo measurements of the elastic mechanical properties of human skin by indentation tests

Pailler-Mattei, C., Bec, S., Zahouani, H.·2008·Medical Engineering & Physics

Abstract

Knowledge about the human skin mechanical properties is essential in several domains, particularly for dermatology, cosmetic or to detect some cutaneous pathology. This study proposes a new method to determine the human skin mechanical properties in vivo using the indentation test. Usually, the skin mechanical parameters obtained with this method are influenced by the mechanical properties of the subcutaneous layers, like muscles. In this study, different mechanical models were used to evaluate the effect of the subcutaneous layers on the measurements and to extract the skin elastic properties from the global mechanical response. The obtained results demonstrate that it is necessary to take into account the effect of the subcutaneous layers to correctly estimate the skin Young's modulus. Moreover, the results illustrate that the variation of the measured Young's modulus at low penetration depth cannot be correctly described with usual one-layer mechanical models. Thus a two-layer elastic model was proposed, which highly improved the measurement of the skin mechanical properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.06.011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pailler-Mattei, C., Bec, S., & Zahouani, H.
Affiliations
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • École Centrale de Lyon (FR)
Corresponding author
Pailler-Mattei, C.
Venue
Medical Engineering & Physics
Published
2007-09-14
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
599-606
ISSN
  • 1350-4533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-4030
OpenAlex
W2037488682
Cited by
724
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Engineering & Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
human skin, skin biomechanics, indentation testing, Young's modulus, in vivo measurement, penetration depth, skin elasticity
MeSH terms
Elasticity, Humans, Models, Biological, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Viscosity, Dermis, Subcutaneous Tissue

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review