The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An optimal control model for maximum-height human jumping
Open accessAbstract
To understand how intermuscular control, inertial interactions among body segments, and musculotendon dynamics coordinate human movement, we have chosen to study maximum-height jumping. Because this activity presents a relatively unambiguous performance criterion, it fits well into the framework of optimal control theory. The human body is modeled as a four-segment, planar, articulated linkage, with adjacent links joined together by frictionless revolutes. Driving the skeletal system are eight musculotendon actuators, each muscle modeled as a three-element, lumped-parameter entity, in series with tendon. Tendon is assumed to be elastic, and its properties are defined by a stress-strain curve. The mechanical behavior of muscle is described by a Hill-type contractile element, including both series and parallel elasticity. Driving the musculotendon model is a first-order representation of excitation-contraction (activation) dynamics. The optimal control problem is to maximize the height reached by the center of mass of the body subject to body-segmental, musculotendon, and activation dynamics, a zero vertical ground reaction force at lift-off, and constraints which limit the magnitude of the incoming neural control signals to lie between zero (no excitation) and one (full excitation). A computational solution to this problem was found on the basis of a Mayne-Polak dynamic optimization algorithm. Qualitative comparisons between the predictions of the model and previously reported experimental findings indicate that the model reproduces the major features of a maximum-height squat jump (i.e. limb-segmental angular displacements, vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces, sequence of muscular activity, overall jump height, and final lift-off time).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Optimality principles in sensorimotor control
Todorov, E. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1309 · Cited by 1,746
Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent
Anderson, F. C., & Pandy, M. G. (2001) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00155-x · Cited by 788
Self-citationComposable controllers for physics-based character animation
Faloutsos, P., van de Panne, M., & Terzopoulos, D. (2001) · Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/383259.383287 · Cited by 331
Evaluation of a Torque-Driven Model of Jumping for Height
King, M. A., Wilson, C., & Yeadon, M. R. (2006) · Journal of Applied Biomechanics · doi:10.1123/jab.22.4.264 · Cited by 65
Haug, W. B., Drinkwater, E. J., & Chapman, D. W. (2015) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000000826 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Pandy, M. G., Zajac, F. E., Sim, E., & Levine, W. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1185-1198
- ISSN
- 0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026044248
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An optimal control model for maximum-height human jumping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90376-e
- The paper
- Pandy, M. G., Zajac, F. E., Sim, E., & Levine, W. S. (1990). An optimal control model for maximum-height human jumping. Journal of Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90376-e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.