Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Curvature characteristics and congruence of the thumb carpometacarpal joint: Differences between female and male joints

Open access
Ateshian, G.A., Rosenwasser, M.P., Mow, V.C.·1992·Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract

Three-dimensional geometric models of the articular surfaces of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint were constructed using precise data obtained from stereophotogrammetry (SPG). It was demonstrated that by using a least-squares surface-fitting technique, the SPG data on the surface can accurately be described by a single parametric biquintic spline function. From this mathematical description, curvature maps of the surfaces were calculated for 13 CMC joints (eight females, average 64 yr old, five males, average 70 yr old). The surface geometry of each joint was analyzed, comparisons were made between trapezial and metacarpal surfaces of the joint and differences determined between males and females. With regard to joint surface areas, the female trapezium is significantly smaller than that of the metacarpal. The shape of the female trapezial surface is also fundamentally different from that of males. No gender-related difference exists regarding the shape of the metacarpal surface. Congruence of the two opposing articular surfaces was defined by their relative principal curvatures. From these definitions, congruence in the radioulnar and dorsovolar anatomic directions, as well as the global congruence of the joint, were calculated. Most CMC joints were found to be more congruent along the radioulnar direction than the dorsovolar direction and, globally, female joints were found to be less congruent than male joints. The concept of joint congruence has played a central role in a number of hypotheses relating to the etiology of CMC joint osteoarthritis (OA), although conflicting hypotheses do exist. The precise quantitative findings of this study may lead to an improved understanding of CMC joint OA, and perhaps explain its prevalence in the female population over 55.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90102-7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Ateshian, G. A., Rosenwasser, M. P., & Mow, V. C.
Venue
Journal of Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-06
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
591-607
ISSN
0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993728802
Cited by
159
References
0
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Curvature characteristics and congruence of the thumb carpometacarpal joint: Differences between female and male joints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0021-9290(92)90102-7
The paper
Ateshian, G. A., Rosenwasser, M. P., & Mow, V. C. (1992). Curvature characteristics and congruence of the thumb carpometacarpal joint: Differences between female and male joints. Journal of Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(92)90102-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.