The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Curvature characteristics and congruence of the thumb carpometacarpal joint: Differences between female and male joints
Open accessAbstract
Three-dimensional geometric models of the articular surfaces of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint were constructed using precise data obtained from stereophotogrammetry (SPG). It was demonstrated that by using a least-squares surface-fitting technique, the SPG data on the surface can accurately be described by a single parametric biquintic spline function. From this mathematical description, curvature maps of the surfaces were calculated for 13 CMC joints (eight females, average 64 yr old, five males, average 70 yr old). The surface geometry of each joint was analyzed, comparisons were made between trapezial and metacarpal surfaces of the joint and differences determined between males and females. With regard to joint surface areas, the female trapezium is significantly smaller than that of the metacarpal. The shape of the female trapezial surface is also fundamentally different from that of males. No gender-related difference exists regarding the shape of the metacarpal surface. Congruence of the two opposing articular surfaces was defined by their relative principal curvatures. From these definitions, congruence in the radioulnar and dorsovolar anatomic directions, as well as the global congruence of the joint, were calculated. Most CMC joints were found to be more congruent along the radioulnar direction than the dorsovolar direction and, globally, female joints were found to be less congruent than male joints. The concept of joint congruence has played a central role in a number of hypotheses relating to the etiology of CMC joint osteoarthritis (OA), although conflicting hypotheses do exist. The precise quantitative findings of this study may lead to an improved understanding of CMC joint OA, and perhaps explain its prevalence in the female population over 55.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cartilage and diarthrodial joints as paradigms for hierarchical materials and structures
Mow, V. C., Ratcliffe, A., & Robin Poole, A. (1992) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/0142-9612(92)90001-5 · Cited by 956
Self-citationFunctional Tissue Engineering: The Role of Biomechanics
Butler, D. L., Goldstein, S. A., & Guilak, F. (2000) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.1318906 · Cited by 624
Cohen, Z. A., McCarthy, D. M., Kwak, S. D., Legrand, P., Fogarasi, F., Ciaccio, E. J., & Ateshian, G. A. (1999) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1053/joca.1998.0165 · Cited by 353
Self-citationThe neural mechanisms of manual dexterity
Sobinov, A. R., & Bensmaia, S. J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-021-00528-7 · Cited by 248
Patient-specific analysis of cartilage and labrum mechanics in human hips with acetabular dysplasia
Henak, C. R., Abraham, C. L., Anderson, A. E., Maas, S. A., Ellis, B. J., Peters, C. L., & Weiss, J. A. (2014) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.003 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Ateshian, G. A., Rosenwasser, M. P., & Mow, V. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 591-607
- ISSN
- 0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993728802
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Curvature characteristics and congruence of the thumb carpometacarpal joint: Differences between female and male joints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0021-9290(92)90102-7
- The paper
- Ateshian, G. A., Rosenwasser, M. P., & Mow, V. C. (1992). Curvature characteristics and congruence of the thumb carpometacarpal joint: Differences between female and male joints. Journal of Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(92)90102-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.