The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Köhler, 1927, Über den Gruppenwirkungsgrad der menschlichen Körperabeit und die Bedingung optimaler Kollektivkraftreakton, Industrielle Psychotechnik, 4, 209
- Moede, 1927, Die Richtlinien der Leistungs-Psychologie, Industrielle Psychotechnik, 4, 193
- Rühlmann, 1900, Allgemeine Maschinenlehre
- Köhler, 1927, Über den Gruppenwirkungsgrad der menschlichen Körperarbeit und die Bedingung optimaler Kollektivkraftreaktion, Industrielle Psychotechnik, 4, 209
- Steiner, 1966, Models for inferring relationships between group size and potential group productivity, Behavioral Science, 11, 273, 10.1002/bs.3830110404 · DOI · Paper page
- Zajonc, 1969, Expectancy and feedback as independent factors in task performance, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 148, 10.1037/h0026887 · DOI
Cited by
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Communication and Persuasion · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1 · Cited by 3,202
An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x09339057 · Cited by 2,721
Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing
Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822 · Cited by 2,216
Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration.
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681 · Cited by 2,196
Social loafing on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve performance.
Jackson, J. M., & Williams, K. D. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.937 · Cited by 215
Social loafing and group evaluation
Harkins, S. G., & Szymanski, K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.6.934 · Cited by 198
Recall suffers from collaboration: Joint recall effects of friendship and task complexity
Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (1995) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2350090303 · Cited by 187
Automation Bias and Errors: Are Crews Better Than Individuals?
Skitka, L. J., Mosier, K. L., Burdick, M., & Rosenblatt, B. (2000) · The International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap1001_5 · Cited by 127
Collaboration and Memory: Effects of Dyadic Retrieval on Different Memory Tasks
Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (1996) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199604)10:2<171::aid-acp385>3.0.co;2-d · Cited by 108
Collaborative learning effects when students have complete or incomplete knowledge
Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2018) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3444 · Cited by 66
Social Loafing and Motivation Gains in Groups: An Integrative Review
Karau, S. J., & Wilhau, A. J. (2020) · Individual Motivation within Groups · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-849867-5.00001-x · Cited by 50
Klehe, U., & Anderson, N. (2007) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00385.x · Cited by 39
Koçal, S., & Özcan, K. (2026) · Verimlilik Dergisi · doi:10.51551/verimlilik.1729580
Metadata
- Authors
- Ingham, A. G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1974-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 371-384
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017761800
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
