Cited by 156Social and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

The self-serving attributional bias: Beyond self-presentation

Greenberg, Jeff, Pyszczynski, Tom, Solomon, Sheldon·1982·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-1031(82)90081-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • Montana State University (US)
  • Skidmore College (US)
Corresponding author
Greenberg, Jeff
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1982-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
56-67
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966222484
Cited by
156
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
17.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
self-serving bias, causal attribution, outcome favorability, self-presentation, self-assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review