The DOI matches its Crossref record.
L-fuzzy sets
Open accessAbstract
This paper explores the foundations of, generalizes, and continues the work of Zadeh in [I] and [2]. Perhaps the most important generalization is the consideration of order structures beyond the unit interval. Because of this we have been able to develop a new point of view toward optimization problems. The significance of this work may lie more in its point of view than in any particular results. The theory is still young, and no doubt many concepts have yet to be formulated, while others have yet to take their final form. However it should now be possible to visualize the outlines of the theory. Throughout the development of the theory of fuzzy sets, pattern classification has been a seminal influence. One reason for this is the natural feeling that probability theory is not appropriate for treating the kind of uncertainty that appears in pattern classification; this uncertainty seems to be more of an ambiguity than a statistical variation. Similar difficulties arise in a wide variety of problems. It is characteristic of attempts to apply probability theory to them that it is difficult or impossible to estimate the distributions assumed to be involved, that there is uncertainty about the nature of the statistical assumptions (independence, etc.), or that certain parameters are ignored, taken as given, or found difficult to estimate. Under these circumstances, the chief use of probability theory has been to partially justify intuitively appealing procedures, to suggest procedures already found useful in statistics, or to provide some sort of insight into the nature of things. We believe that fuzzy sets should be able to do at least this much. Let us consider some specific examples. A housewife faces a fairly typical optimization problem in her grocery shopping: she must select among all possible grocery bundles one that meets as well as possible several conflicting criteria of optimality, such as cost, nutritional value, quality, and variety. The partial ordering of the bundles is an intrinsic quality of this problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning—I
Zadeh, L. A. (1975) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5 · Cited by 12,187
The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning—II
Zadeh, L. A. (1975) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90046-8 · Cited by 2,555
Neutrosophic set - a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set
Smarandache, F. (2006) · 2006 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing · doi:10.1109/grc.2006.1635754 · Cited by 435
On the Fundamental Differences Between Interval Type-2 and Type-1 Fuzzy Logic Controllers
Wu, D. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2012.2186818 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Goguen, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1967-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 145-174
- ISSN
- 0022-247X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054416947
- Cited by
- 2,454
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: L-fuzzy sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0022-247x(67)90189-8
- The paper
- Goguen, J. A. (1967). L-fuzzy sets. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247x(67)90189-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.