Cited by 64Enzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and DynamicsVirology and Viral Diseases

Structural refinement and analysis of Mengo virus

Krishnaswamy, S., Rossmann, Michael G.·1990·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

The structure of Mengo encephalomyelitis virus was refined at 3 A resolution with a final R-factor of 0.221 and a root-mean-square deviation from idealized bond lengths of 0.019 A for 10 A to 3 A data with F greater than or equal to 3 sigma(F). The Hendrickson-Konnert refinement was restrained by the phases derived from the molecular replacement averaging procedure and constrained by the icosahedral symmetry of the virus. The virus consists of 60 protomers each having three major subunits, VP1, VP2 and VP3, along with one smaller internal protein, VP4. The three major subunits form similar eight-stranded beta-barrel structures. Alterations in the original sequence were found at position 45 in VP1 (Arg to Ala) and at position 58 in VP3 (Met to Val). The residues in loops I and II of VP1 (82 to 102), the "FMDV loop" in VP1 (205 to 213), the flexible loop of VP3 in the putative receptor attachment site (175 to 185) as well as the terminal regions 260 to 268 in VP1, 253 to 256 in VP2 and 13 to 15 in VP4 were built or modified in regions of weak density. The variation in temperature factors at the end of the refinement is over a wide range (from 2 to 80 A2), with the disordered outer and inner regions showing high mobility. Four cis proline residues, 105 in VP1, 85 and 152 in VP2 and 59 in VP3, have been identified. The disulfide bridge Cys86 to Cys88 in VP3 has been characterized. One phosphate ion and 233 water positions were included in the refinement. It is suggested that this phosphate is associated with the receptor attachment site. There are two major hydrogen-bonding networks involving solvent atoms; one involving only the subunits of a protomer, and the other connecting the protomers in a pentamer. The distribution of atom types around the icosahedral symmetry axes shows that the 5-fold channel is more hydrophobic than that along the 3-fold axis and that there are more charged residues around the 2-fold axis. The analysis of contacts between the different subunits supports the assignment of the protomeric unit. The five protomers that form the pentameric unit are held together by interactions involving the smaller VP4 protein and the amino termini of VP1 and VP3. The pentamers are associated by means of the amino-terminal region of the VP2 subunits, the beta F strand of the VP3 subunits, the C terminus of the VP4 subunits and the electrostatic helical (alpha A) interactions of VP2 subunits across the icosahedral 2-fold axes. The superposition of the corresponding subunits of Mengo virus, human rhinovirus 14 and southern bean mosaic virus has provided an improved sequence alignment. The largest structural similarity is between the VP3 subunits of Mengo virus and rhinovirus, while the least similarity is between the VP1 subunits. The various specialized insertions in the different subunits can be associated with specific functional requirements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90077-y

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thirteen neutralization escape mutations mapped to four main antigenic sites that are surface-exposed on the capsid: the VP2 "puff" region, the VP3 "knob" region, a VP1 loop between β-strands B and C (BC loop), and two loops in close proximity to the BC loop denoted VP1 loops I and II.

    “Thirteen neutralization escape mutations (shown as green triangles in Fig 8B) mapped to four main antigenic sites that are surface-exposed on the capsid: (i) VP2 “puff” region, (ii) VP3 “knob” region, (iii) a VP1 loop located between β-strands B and C (termed BC loop), and (iv) two loops that are in close proximity to the BC loop denoted VP1 loops I and II [3,68] (Fig 8C).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krishnaswamy, S., & Rossmann, M. G.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-02
Volume
211
Issue
4
Pages
803-844
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064441283
Cited by
64
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
mengovirus, viral capsid structure, VP1, VP2, VP3, VP4, beta-barrel proteins, icosahedral symmetry, disulfide bonds, cis-proline, hydrogen bond network, temperature factor, structure refinement, hydrophobic channels
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Disulfides, Mengovirus, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Conformation, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Thermodynamics, Viral Proteins, X-Ray Diffraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review