CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 134Dental materials and restorationsDental Health and Care UtilizationOral microbiology and periodontitis research

Clinical evaluation of patients eight to nine years after placement of removable partial dentures

Chandler, James A., Brudvik, James S.·1984·The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
DOI 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90366-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Removable partial dentures, constructed following principles outlined in this study, provided reasonable service for an 8- to 9-year period for patients who were wearing them. The oral hygiene of the patients was less than ideal. Few teeth were lost by patients in the study. There were no significant differences in caries incidence, changes in sulcus depths, tooth mobility, or alveolar bone loss between patients who were wearing their dentures and those who were not. There were increased levels of gingival inflammation seen in regions covered by the removable partial dentures and in gingivae apical to clasp arms. Other than these findings, there seemed to be no direct evidence that the removable partial dentures were causing dental or periodontal breakdown.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90366-4

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal studies of distal extension removable dental prostheses indicate that a favorable periodontal prognosis may be expected provided periodontal disease is treated and adequate preprosthetic plaque control established, periodontal health and oral hygiene maintained through self-performed plaque control and periodic maintenance, and patient's motivation reinforced to enhance compliance.

    “Longitudinal studies of distal extension RDPs indicate that a favorable periodontal prognosis may be expected provided the following conditions are satisfied: 1) periodontal disease, if present, is treated and an adequate preprosthetic plaque control regimen established; 2) periodontal health and oral hygiene are maintained through selfperformed plaque control measures 104 and periodic maintenance”

    From Dental prostheses and tooth‐related factors (2018) · cites this paper as [110]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Chandler, J. A., & Brudvik, J. S.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Chandler, James A.
Venue
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-06
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
736-743
ISSN
0022-3913 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0022-3913(84)90366-4
OpenAlex
W2064512807
Cited by
134
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
removable partial dentures, oral hygiene, tooth loss, caries incidence, sulcus depth, tooth mobility, alveolar bone loss, gingivitis, clasp arm, periodontal health
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alveolar Process, Bone Resorption, Consumer Behavior, Dental Caries, Dental Plaque, Denture, Partial, Removable, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gingivitis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Periodontal Pocket, Tooth Mobility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review