Cited by 37

Mechanical trauma as a risk factor in classic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Lack of epidemiologic evidence

Kurland, Leonard T., Radhakrishnan, Kurupath, Smith, Glenn E., Armon, Carmel, Nemetz, Peter N.·1992·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

We have examined the relationship between mechanical injuries and the subsequent development of classic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) through a critical review of the literature. Only prospective evaluation of a large cohort of trauma victims can provide an unbiased answer to this controversy. However, such an evaluation would be prohibitively expensive, and the results would not be available in our lifetime. The results of retrospective case-control studies are conflicting in part because of biases in the selection of patients and controls, poor definition of the nature and extent of the trauma and its chronological relationship to the onset of ALS, and a non-uniform approach to the collection of antecedent information. More rigorously designed studies show no association of ALS to antecedent trauma. The existing data thus do not suggest that mechanical trauma is a risk factor for ALS. Future case-control studies should conform to a standardized methodology. The critical analysis presented here of the research on the purported connection between mechanical injury and ALS may serve as a model for the evaluation of the role of trauma in other chronic diseases. Application of these methodological principles may bring increased scientific rigor to assessing the frequently litigated question of what constitutes a true trauma sequela.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-510x(92)90241-c

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurland, L. T., Radhakrishnan, K., Smith, G. E., Armon, C., & Nemetz, P. N.
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-12
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
133-143
ISSN
0022-510X
Cited by
37
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review