Cited by 125Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes and associated disorders

Similar reduction of first- and second-phase B-cell responses at three different glucose levels in type II diabetes and the effect of gliclazide therapy

Hosker, John P., Rudenski, Aram S., Burnett, Melanie A., Matthews, David R., Turner, Robert C.·1989·Metabolism

Abstract

To characterize the abnormal B-cell response to glucose in type II diabetes, five diet-treated diabetic and six weight-matched non-diabetic subjects were studied using the hyperglycemic clamp technique on three separate days at glycemic levels of 7.5, 10 and 15 mmol/L for 150 minutes with assessment of plasma insulin and C-peptide responses. To reduce possible secondary effects of hyperglycemia, diabetic subjects on a weight-maintaining diet were chosen who had only a slight elevation of the fasting plasma glucose, mean 6.0 mmol/L. They had a normal time-course of both first- and second-phase responses, but both were impaired at each glucose clamp concentration. The first-phase and second-phase C-peptide responses of the diabetic subjects were similarly reduced to mean 49% and 59% of normal, respectively, and the first- and second-phase insulin responses were also reduced to mean 39% and 44% of normal, respectively. The ratio of second- to first-phase plasma C-peptide responses were similar in the diabetic and normal subjects, median 1.6 and 1.5, respectively, as were the same ratios for the insulin responses, 1.4 and 1.1, respectively. The previously described selective reduction of the first-phase response in type II diabetes may be partly a function of the bolus intravenous glucose tests used, in which impaired glucose tolerance in the diabetics gave a greater glycemic stimulus to the second phase than in normal subjects, and partly secondary to long-term hyperglycemia. Th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0026-0495(89)90064-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • T2DM is associated with almost complete loss of 1st phase GIIS and a reduction of 2nd phase insulin secretion.

    “T2DM is associated with the almost complete loss of 1st phase GIIS and a reduction of 2nd phase insulin secretion (Figure 14C) (242, 292).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hosker, J. P., Rudenski, A. S., Burnett, M. A., Matthews, D. R., & Turner, R. C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-08
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
767-772
ISSN
0026-0495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021455568
Cited by
125
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Servier
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, B cell function, first-phase insulin response, second-phase insulin response, C-peptide, hyperglycemic clamp, gliclazide, sulphonylurea therapy, glucose tolerance, insulin secretion
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Gliclazide, Humans, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Kinetics, Middle Aged, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Glucose Clamp Technique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review