Cited by 67Diet and metabolism studiesMuscle metabolism and nutritionDietary Effects on Health

Protein sparing during treatment of obesity: ketogenic versus nonketogenic very low calorie diet

Vazquez, Jorge A., Adibi, Siamak A.·1992·Metabolism

Abstract

Although it is generally agreed that both ketogenic and nonketogenic very low calorie diets promote weight reduction, there is no consensus on a preference of one diet over the other in regard to protein sparing. In the present study, we compared the effects of isocaloric (600 kcal/d) and isonitrogenous (8 g nitrogen/d) ketogenic (low carbohydrate) and nonketogenic diets on parameters of protein and amino acid metabolism, in 16 morbidly obese women maintained on these diets for 4 weeks while confined to a metabolic ward. Cumulative urinary nitrogen excretion (g/4 wk) was significantly (P less than .01) greater (248 +/- 6 v 207 +/- 12, mean +/- SEM, n = 8), and cumulative nitrogen balance significantly (P less than .02) more negative (-50.4 +/- 4.4 v -18.8 +/- 5.7), during treatment with the ketogenic than with the nonketogenic diet. Plasma leucine concentration (mumol/L) was significantly higher (P less than .05) during treatment with the ketogenic than with the nonketogenic diet at day 14 (210 +/- 17 v 150 +/- 8), but not at day 28 (174 +/- 9 v 148 +/- 8). Whole-body rates of leucine oxidation (mmol/h) were significantly higher (P less than .05) during treatment with the ketogenic than with the nonketogenic diet at day 14 (1.29 +/- 0.20 v 0.92 +/- 0.10) and at day 28 (1.00 +/- 0.16 v 0.75 +/- 0.10). Conversely, proteolysis, as measured by leucine turnover rate and urinary excretion of 3-methylhistidine, was not significantly different between the diets.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0026-0495(92)90076-m

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vazquez, J. A., & Adibi, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-04
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
406-414
ISSN
0026-0495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980209192
Cited by
67
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dk015855-22, 7r29dk039157-04)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK15855, DK-39157)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000056, 5 M01 RR00056)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
protein sparing, ketogenic diet, very low calorie diet, morbid obesity, nitrogen balance, urinary nitrogen excretion, leucine oxidation, leucine turnover, proteolysis, 3-methylhistidine, amino acid metabolism, weight loss
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Blood Proteins, Energy Intake, Creatinine, Diet, Reducing, Dietary Proteins, Energy Metabolism, Female, Hormones, Humans, Ketone Bodies, Methylhistidines, Middle Aged, Nitrogen, Obesity, Morbid, Time Factors, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review