Cited by 61Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesPregnancy-related medical researchMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Maternal and fetal effects of the supine and pelvic tilt positions in late pregnancy

Kinsella, S.M., Lee, A., Spencer, J.A.D.·1990·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

Material and fetal cardiovascular effects of position change were assessed in 20 women in late pregnancy. On changing from the left lateral to the supine position, there was a 45% reduction in leg blood flow, measured by strain guage plethysmography. Arterial resistance, measured with Doppler ultrasound in the femoral, brachial and uterine arteries, remained unchanged, confirming the absence of compensatory vasoconstriction. There was no change in blood pressure (BP) in the leg, indicating no significant aortic compression, but a rise in maternal heart rate in the supine position suggested the presence of inferior vena cava (IVC) compression. Neither the left or the right pelvic-tilt position was associated with a significant change in leg blood flow or maternal heart rate compared to the supine position. A possible 'sluice' effect in the placental circulation was not confirmed, as fetal heart rate and umbilical Doppler resistance did not change in any position. In the absence of active vasoconstriction and significant aortic compression, IVC compression is the likely cause of the decrease in leg blood flow, and also of the previously demonstrated decrease in uterine blood flow. Leg BP and Doppler ultrasound measurements of uterine artery resistance may not be adequate measures of the effect of posture on uteroplacental perfusion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0028-2243(90)90044-2

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kinsella, S. M., Lee, A., & Spencer, J. A. D.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-07
Volume
36
Issue
1-2
Pages
11-17
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W2149910933
Cited by
61
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
supine position, pelvic tilt, maternal posture, late pregnancy, leg blood flow, inferior vena cava compression, uteroplacental blood flow, uterine artery resistance, fetal heart rate, maternal heart rate, aortic compression
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Arm, Blood Pressure, Female, Fetus, Heart Rate, Heart Rate, Fetal, Humans, Leg, Posture, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Regional Blood Flow, Supination, Ultrasonics, Uterus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review