Cited by 65Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Effect of maternal position on fetal behavioural state and heart rate variability in healthy late gestation pregnancy

Open access
Stone, Peter R., Burgess, Wendy, McIntyre, Jordan P. R., Gunn, Alistair J., Lear, Christopher A., Bennet, Laura, Mitchell, Edwin A., Thompson, John M. D. +1 more·2017·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Key points: Fetal behavioural state in healthy late gestation pregnancy is affected by maternal position. Fetal state 1F is more likely to occur in maternal supine or right lateral positions. Fetal state 4F is less likely to occur when the woman lies supine or semi‐recumbent. Fetal state change is more likely when the woman is supine or semi‐recumbent. Fetal heart rate variability is affected by maternal position with variability reduced in supine and semi‐recumbent positions. Fetal behavioural states (FBS) are measures of fetal wellbeing. In acute hypoxaemia, the human fetus adapts to a lower oxygen consuming state with changes in the cardiotocograph and reduced fetal activity. Recent studies of late gestation stillbirth described the importance of sleep position in the risk of intrauterine death. We designed this study to assess the effects of different maternal positions on FBS in healthy late gestation pregnancies under controlled conditions. Twenty‐nine healthy women had continuous fetal ECG recordings under standardized conditions in four randomly allocated positions, left lateral, right lateral, supine and semi‐recumbent. Two blinded observers, assigned fetal states in 5 min blocks. Measures of fetal heart rate variability were calculated from ECG beat to beat data. Compared to state 2F, state 4F was less likely to occur when women were semi‐recumbent [odds ratio (OR) = 0.11, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.02, 0.55], and supine (OR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.07, 1.10). State 1F was more likely on the right (OR = 2.36, 95% CI 1.11, 5.04) or supine (OR = 4.99, 95% CI 2.41, 10.43) compared to the left. State change was more likely when the mother was semi‐recumbent (OR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.19, 3.95) or supine (OR = 2.67, 95% CI 1.46, 4.85). There was a significant association of maternal position to mean fetal heart rate. The measures of heart rate variability (SDNN and RMSSD) were reduced in both semi‐recumbent and supine positions. In healthy late gestation pregnancy, maternal position affects FBS and heart rate variability. These effects are likely fetal adaptations to positions which may produce a mild hypoxic stress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jp273201

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dawes G, Meir YJ, Mandruzzato GP. Computerized evaluation of fetal heart-rate patterns. J Perinat Med. 1994;22:491-499.
  2. Spiropoulos K, Prodromaki E, Tsapanos V. Effect of body position on PaO2 and PaCO2 during Pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1991;1:29-34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stone, P. R., Burgess, W., McIntyre, J. P. R., Gunn, A. J., Lear, C. A., Bennet, L., Mitchell, E. A., Thompson, J. M. D., & the Maternal Sleep In Pregnancy Research Group, T. U. O. A.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Stone, Peter R.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-12-11
Volume
595
Issue
4
Pages
1213-1221
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2553620978
Cited by
65
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cure Kids
  • University of Auckland
  • Auckland Medical Research Foundation
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
maternal position, fetal heart rate variability, fetal well-being, supine position, semi-recumbent position, fetal sleep, fetal hypoxaemia, stillbirth risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fetal Heart, Fetal Movement, Heart Rate, Humans, Posture, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Random Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review