Cited by 36Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and MemoryHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Delayed alternation performance in patients with cerebral lesions

Chorover, Stephan L., Cole, Malvin·1966·Neuropsychologia

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0028-3932(66)90016-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chorover, S. L., & Cole, M.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1966-02
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066208406
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
delayed alternation task, frontal lobe lesions, brain lesions, intracranial disease, lesion localization, neuropsychological assessment, dysphasia, dementia, attention, executive function, brain-behavior relationship, neuropsychiatry, neurology, psychopathology, psychosomatic medicine, psychopharmacology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review