The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maternal mortality in developed countries: Not just a concern of the past
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the activities in selected developed countries for strategies to identify maternal deaths, the impact of these strategies on underreporting, and the information needed to understand the events leading to death. DATA SOURCES: We reviewed the literature from the United States, Europe, and Australia for publications dealing with maternal death identification and investigation from 1980 to April 1995. We also obtained information directly from researchers involved in major maternal mortality studies. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We included all 31 reports (from 14 countries) that discussed methods to improve the ascertainment of maternal deaths beyond the routine use of vital registration. Because of the nature of the subject matter, almost all reports relied on descriptive epidemiology. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We found that a variety of methods can be used to improve the ascertainment of maternal deaths, including linkage of birth and fetal death certificates, check-boxes on death certificates, periodic review of deaths of reproductive-age women, and ongoing birth registries and medical audits. Information from a variety of sources is also needed to understand the events leading to death. CONCLUSION: The numbers of deaths due to pregnancy and its complications are underestimated in most developed countries. Improved ascertainment of maternal death is needed to determine the magnitude of the problem and to assess trends and identify risk groups, allowing development of appropriate and effective strategies to prevent the morbidity and mortality associated with pregnancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hogan, M. C., Foreman, K. J., Naghavi, M., Ahn, S. Y., Wang, M., Makela, S. M., Lopez, A. D., Lozano, R., & Murray, C. J. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60518-1 · Cited by 2,194
Pregnancy and the Risk of Stroke
Kittner, S. J., Stern, B. J., Feeser, B. R., Hebel, J. R., Nagey, D. A., Buchholz, D. W., Earley, C. J., Johnson, C. J., Macko, R. F., Sloan, M. A., et al. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199609123351102 · Cited by 665
Global burden of maternal death and disability
AbouZahr, C. (2003) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldg015 · Cited by 567
Estimates of maternal mortality worldwide between 1990 and 2005: an assessment of available data
Hill, K., Thomas, K., AbouZahr, C., Walker, N., Say, L., Inoue, M., & Suzuki, E. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61572-4 · Cited by 469
Pregnancy-related mortality in the united states, 1987–1990
BERG, C., ATRASH, H., KOONIN, L., & TUCKER, M. (1996) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0029-7844(96)00135-4 · Cited by 384
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ATRASH, H., ALEXANDER, S., & BERG, C.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 700-705
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083649092
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal mortality in developed countries: Not just a concern of the past. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0029-7844(95)00200-b
- The paper
- ATRASH, H., ALEXANDER, S., & BERG, C. (1995). Maternal mortality in developed countries: Not just a concern of the past. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(95)00200-b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.