Cited by 58Polymer crystallization and propertiesBlock Copolymer Self-AssemblySolidification and crystal growth phenomena

Differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy investigations of the isothermal crystallization of a poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(methyl methacrylate) block copolymer

Richardson, P.H., Richards, R.W., Blundell, D.J., MacDonald, W.A., Mills, P.·1995·Polymer

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0032-3861(95)97866-e

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In weakly segregated systems (low χN values, T_ODT > Tc > Tg), there is little morphological restriction for crystallization, allowing a break out from the ordered melt structure, so crystallization determines the final structure, usually forming crystalline lamellae and erasing the previous melt structure.

    “In this case, there is little morphological restriction for the crystallization process, which allows a break out from the ordered melt structure, therefore the crystallization determines the final structure, usually crystalline lamellae are formed, erasing the previous structure of the melt [ 102 , 103 , 109 , 121 , 125 , 150-153 , 160-171 ].”

    From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [153]

  • In medium segregated systems (medium χN values, T_ODT > Tc > Tg), the final morphology depends on the applied thermal procedure: if the sample is cooled from the melt very fast (quenching), the morphology of the melt is maintained; otherwise, the final morphology is governed by the crystallization process.

    “For these block copolymers the final morphology (i.e., the morphology of the solidified sample) depends on the applied thermal procedure: if the sample is cooled from the melt very fast, i.e., quenching, the morphology of the melt is maintained. Otherwise, the final morphology will be governed by the crystallization process [ 102 , 103 , 150-153 , 160-164 , 172 , 173 ].”

    From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [153]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richardson, P. H., Richards, R. W., Blundell, D. J., MacDonald, W. A., & Mills, P.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Richards, R.W.
Venue
Polymer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-01
Volume
36
Issue
16
Pages
3059-3069
ISSN
0032-3861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080783725
Cited by
58
References
33
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Polymer (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
Keywords
poly(ethylene oxide), poly(methyl methacrylate), block copolymers, isothermal crystallization, spherulite growth rate, surface energy, excess enthalpy, Avrami exponent, homogeneous nucleation, melt viscosity, heat of fusion, supercooling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review