The Natural Breakdown of the Present Interglacial and its Possible Intervention by Human Activities
Abstract
On the premise that climate responds in a stable and well-behaved manner to changes of terrestrial or extraterrestrial conditions of environment, the question of anticipating when the present interglacial will break down is explored from two different viewpoints. The concept, that the timing of the breakdown can be inferred through a comparison of the duration of the present interglacial (to date) with the duration of previous interglacials of similar warmth in the upper Quaternary, is examined from the viewpoint of the chronology of changes of solar radiation received at the top of the atmosphere, generally recognized as a likely causative agent in the development of interglacials. It is found that the radiation changes around the time of the present interglacial are somewhat different in character from those that accompanied the last interglacial, but that the radiation changes around the time of the last interglacial were more nearly similar to those which may have accompanied earlier interglacials. From this viewpoint, comparisons drawn between the present and previous interglacials are judged to be of uncertain value as a predictive tool for the future. The principal effects of man's activities on present-day climate are then reviewed. and the thermal effects of anticipated future increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide and particle loading are compared. It is concluded that the net impact of human activities on the climate of future decades and centuries is quite likely…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By the early 1970s, the notion of a global cooling trend was widely accepted, albeit poorly understood.
“By the early 1970s, when Mitchell updated his work (Mitchell 1972), the notion of a global cooling trend was widely accepted, albeit poorly understood.”
From THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GLOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS (2008) · cites this paper as Mitchell 1972
Cites
Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols: Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate
Rasool, S. I., & Schneider, S. H. (1971) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.173.3992.138 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schneider, S. H., & Mass, C. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.190.4216.741 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GLOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS
Peterson, T. C., Connolley, W. M., & Fleck, J. (2008) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/2008bams2370.1 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mitchell, J. M.
- Affiliations
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mitchell, J.Murray
- Venue
- Quaternary Research
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1972-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 436-445
- ISSN
- 0033-5894 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-0287
- OpenAlex
- W2110363870
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Quaternary Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
- Keywords
- Holocene, interglacial duration, top-of-atmosphere radiation, Last Interglacial, Quaternary climate, anthropogenic climate change, atmospheric CO2, global warming, climate prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review