Cited by 53Geology and Paleoclimatology ResearchClimate variability and modelsClimate Change and Environmental Impact

The Natural Breakdown of the Present Interglacial and its Possible Intervention by Human Activities

Mitchell, J.Murray·1972·Quaternary Research

Abstract

On the premise that climate responds in a stable and well-behaved manner to changes of terrestrial or extraterrestrial conditions of environment, the question of anticipating when the present interglacial will break down is explored from two different viewpoints. The concept, that the timing of the breakdown can be inferred through a comparison of the duration of the present interglacial (to date) with the duration of previous interglacials of similar warmth in the upper Quaternary, is examined from the viewpoint of the chronology of changes of solar radiation received at the top of the atmosphere, generally recognized as a likely causative agent in the development of interglacials. It is found that the radiation changes around the time of the present interglacial are somewhat different in character from those that accompanied the last interglacial, but that the radiation changes around the time of the last interglacial were more nearly similar to those which may have accompanied earlier interglacials. From this viewpoint, comparisons drawn between the present and previous interglacials are judged to be of uncertain value as a predictive tool for the future. The principal effects of man's activities on present-day climate are then reviewed. and the thermal effects of anticipated future increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide and particle loading are compared. It is concluded that the net impact of human activities on the climate of future decades and centuries is quite likely…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0033-5894(72)90069-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By the early 1970s, the notion of a global cooling trend was widely accepted, albeit poorly understood.

    “By the early 1970s, when Mitchell updated his work (Mitchell 1972), the notion of a global cooling trend was widely accepted, albeit poorly understood.”

    From THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GLOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS (2008) · cites this paper as Mitchell 1972

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, J. M.
Affiliations
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Mitchell, J.Murray
Venue
Quaternary Research
Published
1972-11
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
436-445
ISSN
  • 0033-5894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-0287
OpenAlex
W2110363870
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Quaternary Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
Keywords
Holocene, interglacial duration, top-of-atmosphere radiation, Last Interglacial, Quaternary climate, anthropogenic climate change, atmospheric CO2, global warming, climate prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review