Cited by 3,303Geology and Paleoclimatology ResearchMarine and environmental studiesPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

Age dating and the orbital theory of the ice ages: development of a high-resolution 0 to 300,000-year chronostratigraphy

Martinson, Douglas G., Pisias, Nicklas G., Hays, James D., Imbrie, John, Moore, Theodore C., Shackleton, Nicholas J.·1987·Quaternary Research

Abstract

Abstract Using the concept of “orbital tuning”, a continuous, high-resolution deep-sea chronostratigraphy has been developed spanning the last 300,000 yr. The chronology is developed using a stacked oxygen-isotope stratigraphy and four different orbital tuning approaches, each of which is based upon a different assumption concerning the response of the orbital signal recorded in the data. Each approach yields a separate chronology. The error measured by the standard deviation about the average of these four results (which represents the “best” chronology) has an average magnitude of only 2500 yr. This small value indicates that the chronology produced is insensitive to the specific orbital tuning technique used. Excellent convergence between chronologies developed using each of five different paleoclimatological indicators (from a single core) is also obtained. The resultant chronology is also insensitive to the specific indicator used. The error associated with each tuning approach is estimated independently and propagated through to the average result. The resulting error estimate is independent of that associated with the degree of convergence and has an average magnitude of 3500 yr, in excellent agreement with the 2500-yr estimate. Transfer of the final chronology to the stacked record leads to an estimated error of ±1500 yr. Thus the final chronology has an average error of ±5000 yr.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0033-5894(87)90046-9

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinson, D. G., Pisias, N. G., Hays, J. D., Imbrie, J., Moore, T. C., & Shackleton, N. J.
Affiliations
  • Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • ExxonMobil (United States) (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Quaternary Research
Published
1987-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
1-29
ISSN
  • 0033-5894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-0287
OpenAlex
W2146605432
Cited by
3,303
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 92 · 2013: 88 · 2012: 71
FWCI
50.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Quaternary Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
orbital tuning, ice ages, oxygen isotopes, orbital forcing, paleoclimate chronology, paleoclimate indicators, Quaternary stratigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review