Cited by 136Malaria Research and ControlBird parasitology and diseasesVector-borne infectious diseases

Demonstration by the polymerase chain reaction of mixed Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax infections undetected by conventional microscopy

Brown, Arthur E., Kain, Kevin C., Pipithkul, Jaroon, Webster, H.Kyle·1992·Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

Mixed malaria infections (Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax) are suspected to occur at a greater frequency than is detected by conventional light microscopy. To determine this frequency we carried out a prospective 'blinded' comparison of diagnosis by conventional light microscopy and enzymatic amplification of the circumsporozoite gene extracted from dried spotted blood samples. Patients were previously healthy, active duty Thai soldiers assigned to a malaria risk area presenting with malaria. Microscopy (oil immersion objective at 1000 x magnification) involved examination of Giemsa-stained thick and thin blood films by an experienced microscopist. Whole blood samples (25 microliters) dried on filter paper were used for species-specific parasite deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) amplification by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and hybridization with radiolabelled P. falciparum and P. vivax probes. Of 137 consecutive cases of malaria studied, 9% (3/32) of microscopically diagnosed P. falciparum infections and 5% (5/104) of microscopically diagnosed P. vivax infections were found to be mixed by the PCR/DNA probe systems, while 1 case was diagnosed as mixed by both microscopy and PCR. The possibility that malaria patients may have undetected mixed infections should be kept in mind because of the specific therapy required both for P. falciparum and for radical cure of P. vivax.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90147-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Molecular detection for Plasmodium diagnosis using PCR has resulted in increased sensitivity and species discrimination compared to either microscopic or immunochromatographic diagnosis of malaria.

    “Molecular detection for Plasmodium diagnosis using PCR has resulted in increased sensitivity and species discrimination compared to either microscopic or immunochromatographic diagnosis of malaria (2, 4, 12, 14, 22, 23, 25, 27).”
  • Several studies reported posttreatment detection of Plasmodium DNA up to 4 days after microscopic detection.

    “Several studies reported the posttreatment detection of Plasmodium DNA up to 4 days after microscopic detection (4, 25)”
  • Most published PCR assays are gel based with or without subsequent probe hybridizations.

    “However, most published PCR assays are gel based with (4, 5, 15) or without (2, 3, 9, 23, 25-27, 29, 31, 35, 36) subsequent probe hybridizations”
  • A drawback common to all DNA-based malaria assays is the real possibility of detecting persistent DNA in the bloodstream after the infection has subsided.

    “A drawback common to all DNA-based malaria assays is the real possibility of detecting persistent DNA in the bloodstream after the infection has subsided.”
  • Many published studies show improved sensitivity and specificity of PCR-based assays over microscopic or immunochromatographic diagnosis of malaria.

    “Although there are many published studies showing the improved sensitivity and specificity of PCR-based assays over microscopic or immunochromatographic diagnosis of malaria (2, 4, 12, 14, 22, 23, 25, 27), only a handful take advantage of the even more sensitive and time-efficient real-time PCR technologies.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, A. E., Kain, K. C., Pipithkul, J., & Webster, H. K.
Affiliations
  • Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (TH)
  • Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
Venue
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
1992-11
Volume
86
Issue
6
Pages
609-612
ISSN
0035-9203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031653118
Cited by
136
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bird parasitology and diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
Keywords
mixed malaria infection, Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, PCR diagnosis, microscopic diagnosis, underdiagnosis, dried blood spots, species-specific DNA probes, radical cure
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Prospective Studies, Oligonucleotide Probes, Protozoan Proteins, DNA, Protozoan, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Malaria, Falciparum, Malaria, Vivax

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review