Cited by 40Malaria Research and ControlBiosensors and Analytical DetectionClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Informed decision-making before changing to RDT: a comparison of microscopy, rapid diagnostic test and molecular techniques for the diagnosis and identification of malaria parasites in Kassala, eastern Sudan

Osman, Mamoun M. M., Nour, Bakri Y. M., Sedig, Mohamed F., De Bes, Laura, Babikir, Adil M., Mohamedani, Ahmed A., Mens, Petra F.·2010·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are promoted for the diagnosis of malaria in many countries. The question arises whether laboratories where the current method of diagnosis is microscopy should also switch to RDT. This problem was studied in Kassala, Sudan where the issue of switching to RDT is under discussion. METHODS: Two hundred and three blood samples were collected from febrile patients suspected of having malaria. These were subsequently analysed with microscopy, RDT (SD Bioline P.f/P.v) and PCR for the detection and identification of Plasmodium parasites. RESULTS: Malaria parasites were detected in 36 blood samples when examined microscopically, 54 (26.6%) samples were found positive for malaria parasites by RDT, and 44 samples were positive by PCR. Further analysis showed that the RDT used in our study resulted in a relatively high number of false positive samples. When microscopy was compared with PCR, an agreement of 96.1% and k = 0.88 (sensitivity 85.7% and specificity 100%) was found. However, when RDT was compared with PCR, an agreement of only 81.2 and k = 0.48 (sensitivity 69% and specificity 84%) was found. CONCLUSION: PCR has proven to be one of the most specific and sensitive diagnostic methods, particularly for malaria cases with low parasitaemia. However, this technique has limitations in its routine use under resource-limited conditions, such as our study location. At present, based on these results, microscopy remains the best option for routine diagnosis of malaria in Kassala, eastern Sudan.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02659.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osman, M. M. M., Nour, B. Y. M., Sedig, M. F., De Bes, L., Babikir, A. M., Mohamedani, A. A., & Mens, P. F.
Affiliations
  • Kassala University (SD)
  • University of Gezira (SD)
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-25
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
1442-1448
ISSN
1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1639668868
Cited by
40
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fakultet Medicinskih Nauka, Univerziteta U Kragujevcu
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
malaria diagnosis, rapid diagnostic tests, microscopy, PCR, Plasmodium species identification, diagnostic accuracy, false positives, low parasitaemia, resource-limited settings, Kassala
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aged, Child, Decision Making, Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Malaria, Male, Microscopy, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Sudan, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Malaria, Falciparum, Malaria, Vivax, Parasitemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review