The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our Delphi-type methods involved 14 individuals, an appropriate number for these methods, 51 but a number that makes the choice of participants important.”
Citations
Cites
(1932) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,568
An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 · Cited by 6,061
Fleming, N. B. (2000) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004495692_008 · Cited by 2,166
The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion
Dalkey, N. C. (1969) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/rm5888 · Cited by 1,673
Techniques of attitude scale construction.
Edwards, A. L. (1957) · Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks · doi:10.1037/14423-000 · Cited by 1,670
A Basis for Scaling Qualitative Data
Guttman, L. (1944) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2086306 · Cited by 1,333
Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference
Samuelson, P. A. (1948) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2549561 · Cited by 1,014
Ravenel, M. P. (1926) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.16.4.414-c · Cited by 925
Alternative Approaches to the Theory of Choice in Risk-Taking Situations
Arrow, K. J. (1951) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1907465 · Cited by 729
Thurstone, L. L., & Chave, E. J. (1929) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 626
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Adelson, 1967, The education innovation study, Am. Behavioral Scientist, 10, 21
- Adelson, 1967, The education innovation study, Am. Behavioral Scientist, 10, 8, 10.1177/000276426701000704 · DOI
- Adelson, 1967, The education innovation study, Am. Behavioral Scientist, 10, 21
- Campbell, 1968, The Delphi technique: Implementation in the corporate environment, Mgmt Ser., 5, 37
- Dalkey, 1963, An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts, Mgmt Sci., 9, 458, 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 · DOI · Paper page
- 1970, Busin. Week
- Helmer, 1967, Vital Speeches, 33, 497
- Helmer, 1959, On the Epistemology of the Inexact Sciences, 10.1287/mnsc.6.1.25 · DOI
- Helmer, 1959, Mgmt Sci., 6, 25, 10.1287/mnsc.6.1.25 · DOI
- Kaplan, 1950, The prediction of social and technological events, Publ. Opinion Q., 14, 13, 10.1086/266153 · DOI
- Maier, 1967, Assets and liabilities in group problem solving: The need for an integrative function, Psychol. Rev., 74, 239, 10.1037/h0024737 · DOI
- Neiswender, 1966, Realites, 50
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. P., Cane, J., & Wood, C. E. (2013) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 · Cited by 7,629
The SCARE 2020 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines
Agha, R. A., Franchi, T., Sohrabi, C., Mathew, G., Kerwan, A., Thoma, A., Beamish, A. J., Noureldin, A., Rao, A., Vasudevan, B., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.10.034 · Cited by 5,594
The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus
Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/pdz9-th90 · Cited by 4,500
Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research
Jones, J., & Hunter, D. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376 · Cited by 3,471
The SCARE 2023 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines
Sohrabi, C., Mathew, G., Maria, N., Kerwan, A., Franchi, T., Agha, R. A., & Collaborators (2023) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000000373 · Cited by 3,112
Metadata
- Authors
- Pill, J.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pill, Juri
- Venue
- Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1971-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-71
- ISSN
- 0038-0121 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968468300
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 26.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- commons.case.edu
- Licence
- public-domain
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Socio-Economic Planning Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Scholarly Commons @ Case Western Reserve University (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Keywords
- Delphi method, consensus building, expert panel, subjective scaling, uncertainty, historical development, evaluation methodology, annotated bibliography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review