Cited by 5,594Academic Writing and PublishingMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsDelphi Technique in Research

The SCARE 2020 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines

Open access
Agha, Riaz A., Franchi, Thomas, Sohrabi, Catrin, Mathew, Ginimol, Kerwan, Ahmed, Thoma, Achilles, Beamish, Andrew J., Noureldin, Ashraf +50 more·2020·International Journal of Surgery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The SCARE Guidelines were first published in 2016 and were last updated in 2018. They provide a structure for reporting surgical case reports and are used and endorsed by authors, journal editors and reviewers, in order to increase robustness and transparency in reporting surgical cases. They must be kept up to date in order to drive forwards reporting quality. As such, we have updated these guidelines via a DELPHI consensus exercise. METHODS: The updated guidelines were produced via a DELPHI consensus exercise. Members were invited from the previous DELPHI group, as well as editorial board members and peer reviewers of the International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. The expert group completed an online survey to indicate their agreement with proposed changes to the checklist items. RESULTS: A total of 54 surgical experts agreed to participate and 53 (98%) completed the survey. The responses and suggested modifications were incorporated into the new 2020 guideline. There was a high degree of agreement amongst the SCARE Group, with all modified SCARE items receiving over 70% scores 7-9. CONCLUSION: A DELPHI consensus exercise was completed and an updated and improved SCARE Checklist is now presented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.10.034

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The site of AWE can lead to a variety of differential diagnoses, including hernia, abscess, lipoma, desmoid tumor, hematoma, lymphadenopathy, or malignancy.

    “The site of AWE can lead to a variety of differential diagnoses, including hernia, abscess, lipoma, desmoid tumor, hematoma, lymphadenopathy, or malignancy11.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agha, R. A., Franchi, T., Sohrabi, C., Mathew, G., Kerwan, A., Thoma, A., Beamish, A. J., Noureldin, A., Rao, A., Vasudevan, B., Challacombe, B., Perakath, B., Kirshtein, B., Ekser, B., Pramesh, C. S., Laskin, D. M., Machado-Aranda, D., Miguel, D., Pagano, D., Millham, F. H., Roy, G., Kadioglu, H., Nixon, I. J., Mukherjee, I., McCaul, J. A., Chi-Yong Ngu, J., Albrecht, J., Rivas, J. G., Raveendran, K., Derbyshire, L., Ather, M. H., Thorat, M. A., Valmasoni, M., Bashashati, M., Chalkoo, M., Teo, N. Z., Raison, N., Muensterer, O. J., Bradley, P. J., Goel, P., Pai, P. S., Afifi, R. Y., Rosin, R. D., Coppola, R., Klappenbach, R., Wynn, R., De Wilde, R. L., Surani, S., Giordano, S., Massarut, S., Raja, S. G., Basu, S., Enam, S. A., Manning, T. G., Cross, T., Karanth, V. K., Kasivisvanathan, V., & Mei, Z.
Affiliations
  • Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Lister Hospital (GB)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
  • Madras Institute of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (IN)
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Dr Gray's Hospital (GB)
  • Rabin Medical Center (IL)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • Tata Memorial Hospital (IN)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Hospital CUF Descobertas (PT)
  • Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IT)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (IN)
  • Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN)
  • Staten Island University Hospital (US)
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (GB)
  • NHS Lothian (GB)
  • Changi General Hospital (SG)
  • Government Medical College (IN)
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
Corresponding author
Franchi, Thomas
Venue
International Journal of Surgery
Published
2020-12
Volume
84
Pages
226-230
ISSN
  • 1743-9159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9191
OpenAlex
W3103171760
Cited by
5,594
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 262 · 2023: 1811 · 2022: 1735 · 2021: 1577 · 2020: 35
FWCI
4807.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Surgery (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2019-18-006)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
reporting quality, reporting checklist, consensus recommendations, Delphi consensus
MeSH terms
Delphi Technique, Humans, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Guidelines as Topic, Consensus, Checklist, Research Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review