Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 721

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil—I. Fumigation with chloroform

Open access
Jenkinson, D.S., Powlson, D.S.·1976·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

This series of five papers is a study of how biocidal treatments influence metabolism in soil, directed particularly towards the flush of decomposition caused by fumigation, and designed to see if the size of this flush can be used as a measure of the soil biomass. Chloroform fumigation caused an immediate increase in the amounts of ammonium and organic C extracted from a soil by 1 N K 2 SO 4 . When the CHCl 3 -treated soil was then inoculated with fresh soil and incubated for 10 days. it consumed 2·8 times more O 2 , evolved 2·2 times more CO 2 and mineralised 7·3 times more N than an unfumigated soil. Extractable organic C decreased by about 40% when the fumigated soil was incubated for 10 days. A second fumigation given immediately after the first produced no further increase in the flush, but some recovery occurred if the soil was incubated between fumigations. However, this recovery was slow and incomplete; a second fumigation given 53 days after the first gave a flush only one-seventh the size of the first. Glucose (or ryegrass) added to the soil and allowed to decompose before fumigation increased the size of the flush. After a 52-day incubation, 29% of the C originally added as 14 C labelled glucose remained in the soil; fumigation on the 52nd day increased the evolution of labelled CO 2 during the subsequent 10-day period by a factor of 8. Fumigation of a soil that had already been sterilized by 2·5 Mrads of gamma radiation increased the flush slightly; the amount of O 2 consumed in 10 days increased from 123 to 137 mg/100 g soil. It is proposed that the flush of decomposition following CHCl 3 fumigation is caused by the decomposition of killed organisms by the survivors (or by organisms added in the inoculum) and that organisms are more rapidly and completely attacked after exposure to CHCl 3 than after irradiation. On this hypothesis. 10% of the glucose C originally added to the soil was located in the soil biomass after 52 days.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0038-0717(76)90001-8

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 721

Metadata

Authors
Jenkinson, D. S., & Powlson, D. S.
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1976-01
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
167-177
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969573697
Cited by
721
References
11
FWCI
19.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil—I. Fumigation with chloroform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90001-8
The paper
Jenkinson, D. S., & Powlson, D. S. (1976). The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil—I. Fumigation with chloroform. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90001-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.