Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil—II. Gamma irradiation, autoclaving, air-drying and fumigation

Open access
Powlson, D.S., Jenkinson, D.S.·1976·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

Respiration and mineralisation of N were measured in a set of contrasting soils that had either been autoclaved, air-dried, fumigated (with chloroform or methyl bromide) or exposed to gamma radiation. The soils used were a manured and an unmanured arable soil, an acid and a neutral woodland soil, an arable sandy soil and an organic soil under grass. With the exception of the acid woodland soil, the flushes of decomposition (i.e. the increases in O 2 consumption, CO 2 evolution and N mineralisation that occurred when the treated soil was inoculated and incubated for 10 days) were in the order: air-drying < CH 3 Br ⩽ CHCl 3 < irradiation < autoclaving. All of the treatments, except air-drying, decreased the ratio (C mineralised after treatmcnt)/(N mineralised after treatment). All of the treatments increased the amount of 1 N K 2 SO 4 extractable organic C, autoclaving causing by far the greatest increase. Neither of the fumigants increased respiration in the acid soil over the whole 10 day period, although N mineralisation was slightly increased. Irradiation, air-drying and autoclaving did, however, produce a flush in the acid soil, the order being: irradiation < air-drying < autoclaving. A soluble substrate, extracted from yeast cells by ultrasonic disintegration, decomposed to about the same extent in neutral and in acid soil. When 14 C labelled glucose was added to the acid soil and incubated for 52 days, the retention of labelled C was slightly greater (31·6%) than in a comparable near-neutral soil (28·8%). However, the flush that followed fumigation of the acid soil was only half that in the near-neutral soil, suggesting that less biomass is formed under acid conditions. Liming increased the size of the flush in an acid soil. For soils from the same field but under different management, the size of the flush caused by CHCl 3 is in the order: grassland > cropped arable > bare fallow. The flush is much more sensitive to differences in soil management than is the total amount of soil organic matter; a fallowed soil lost half its organic C in 10 yr whereas the increase in respiration that followed fumigation fell to one-seventh its original value. Two Nigerian soils behaved similarly; a soil that had been 2 years under cultivation contained only 16% less total organic C than an adjacent soil still under secondary forest, yet the flush in the cultivated soil was half that in the forest soil. The amount of substrate metabolised during the flush is thus very sensitive to changes in soil management that alter the amount of fresh organic matter entering the soil each year.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0038-0717(76)90002-x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Powlson, D. S., & Jenkinson, D. S.
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1976-01
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
179-188
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047742579
Cited by
297
References
0
FWCI
20.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil—II. Gamma irradiation, autoclaving, air-drying and fumigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90002-x
The paper
Powlson, D. S., & Jenkinson, D. S. (1976). The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil—II. Gamma irradiation, autoclaving, air-drying and fumigation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90002-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.