The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian birds: A simple example of Oaten's stochastic model of optimal foraging
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
Cited by
Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology
DALL, S., GIRALDEAU, L., OLSSON, O., MCNAMARA, J., & STEPHENS, D. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.010 · Cited by 1,374
Research on self-control: An integrating framework
Logue, A. W. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00053978 · Cited by 792
Search Theory and Mate Choice. I. Models of Single-Sex Discrimination
Real, L. (1990) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285103 · Cited by 555
Foraging and Flocking Strategies: Information in an Uncertain Environment
Clark, C. W., & Mangel, M. (1984) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284228 · Cited by 444
RISK AND FORAGING IN STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTS
Real, L., & Caraco, T. (1986) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.002103 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, R. F.
- Venue
- Theoretical Population Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 244-256
- ISSN
- 0040-5809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032921002
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian birds: A simple example of Oaten's stochastic model of optimal foraging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0040-5809(80)90051-9
- The paper
- Green, R. F. (1980). Bayesian birds: A simple example of Oaten's stochastic model of optimal foraging. Theoretical Population Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(80)90051-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
