The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Foraging and Flocking Strategies: Information in an Uncertain Environment
Abstract
In this paper we have investigated the effects of uncertainty and information on the foraging strategies of animals. We first argue that group foraging, or flocking, can increase individual feeding rates as a result of the sharing of information among group members. Also, members of a foraging group may experience reduced variation in their feeding rates. Both of these advantages increase with the scarcity and patchiness of the food supply. On the other hand, our analysis also suggests that the informational advantages of flocking may tend to be dissipated by "overflocking," which is in fact an evolutionarily stable strategy. (Possible defense strategies against overflocking, such as territoriality or aggression, have not been considered here. We also discuss the strategy of individual foragers. We suggest that the traditional analysis in terms of marginal values, residence times, and giving-up times, may be misleading. It turns out to be important to "probe," especially in patches where food abundance is highly variable. The marginal value theorem fails completely to reflect this aspect of uncertainty and information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
Cited by
Functions of Shoaling Behaviour in Teleosts
Pitcher, T. J. (1986) · The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-8261-4_12 · Cited by 962
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400837106 · Cited by 914
Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information
Giraldeau, L., Valone, T. J., & Templeton, J. J. (2002) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1065 · Cited by 560
RISK AND FORAGING IN STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTS
Real, L., & Caraco, T. (1986) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.002103 · Cited by 373
Gibson, R. M., Bradbury, J. W., & Vehrencamp, S. L. (1991) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/2.2.165 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, C. W., & Mangel, M.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1984-05
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 626-641
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2089368958
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foraging and Flocking Strategies: Information in an Uncertain Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284228
- The paper
- Clark, C. W., & Mangel, M. (1984). Foraging and Flocking Strategies: Information in an Uncertain Environment. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284228
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.